Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get

On 11/10/2025 5:01 PM, JTEM wrote:
> On 11/10/25 4:46 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
> 
>> Please stop trying to have multiple conversations with me, okay?!
> 
> It's the same conversation, approached differently to try and
> avoid that brick wall in your head.
> 
>> As I have already told you, tachyons are not part of the Standard Model.
> 
> #1.  You also told me that you're not an expert, so stop saying things
> predicated on the notion that you are.
> 
> #2.  The subject was tachyons and the implications of same. I don't care
> what you misunderstand any models to be saying. Even for someone as
> brain damaged as you it should be obvious that if tachyons exist then
> sending information backwards in time is possible.
> 
> #3.  There is evidence consistent with the existence of tachyons. You
> can claim that the evidence is less than compelling but you can't say
> they are excluded, because they are not.
> 

Yes, as of today, they are excluded!  Here are the 17 particles that 
compromise the Standard Model:

Fermions (Matter Particles)

  Quarks:
    Up (u)
    Down (d)
    Charm (c)
    Strange (s)
    Top (t)
    Bottom (b)

  Leptons:

    Electron (\(e^{-}\))
    Muon (\(\mu ^{-}\))
    Tau (\(\tau ^{-}\))
    Electron neutrino (\(\nu _{e}\))
    Muon neutrino (\(\nu _{\mu }\))
    Tau neutrino (\(\nu _{\tau }\))

Bosons (Force Carriers and Higgs)

  Gauge Bosons:
    Photon (\(\gamma \))
    Gluon (\(g\))
    W boson (\(W^{\pm }\))
    Z boson (\(Z^{0}\))

  Scalar Boson:
    Higgs boson (H)

As you & anyone else whatsoever can see for themselves, tachyons are not 
listed!!  (Hee, hee.)

Dawn