Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get

JTEM wrote:

> On 11/11/25 7:29 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
> 
> > My undergraduate degree
> 
> Higher ed is already facing a lot of heat right now. They
> don't need you dragging it through the mud.


LOL!

> 
> > As with so many things, one cannot, at least on empirical grounds,
> > "prove a negative".
> 
> We don't have to. Retrocausality is the inescapable conclusion
> here. It must exist. Information must travel backwards in time,
> and does.
> 
> According to Einstein, we don't just perceive a movement
> backwards in time, our perception is reality. It's a different
> reality than that of the photon but the photon's reality is
> also correct. For it. Just not us.
> 
> I'm guessing that it's your inability to wrap your little
> disordered mind around this one fact that is preventing you
> from moving forward.