Re: Photons: Delta Dawn Flood, what's the flour you've got on?

On 11/23/25 9:28 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> JTEM wrote:
>> Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry
>> about anyone rolling you in flour & looking for the wet spot...
> 
> Speaking of real names: What is yours?

Obviously you're a newbie or you'd already know.

>> Okay, so I cited the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement
>> experiment as an example of what people are calling
>> Retrocausality.
> 
> It is impossible to know to what citation you are referring

Well. I wouldn't admit that if I were you.

> However, know that the (outcome of the) Delayed Choice Quantum _Eraser_
> experiment is frequently misinterpreted even by some physicists.  There is
> actually no retrocausality.

Your certainty was never in question, only your sanity.

The results were predicted. It wasn't a case where someone said, "Oh,
I dunno, let's throw this together for no apparent reason, call it an
experiment."

The results were predicted, some argue "Observed" in nature. The
experiment was designed to demonstrate this phenomenon.

Photons don't experience time. There is no "Past" or "Future" as far
as they are concerned. This is how we can observe "Spooky Action at a 
Distance." And that's all the experiment is doing:  Reproducing Spooky 
Action at a Distance.

How?

Because photons don't experience "Distance" either. No time, no
distance, so just as two entangled photons appear to "Magically"
send information across vast distances, they also appear to send info
backwards in time. Because for them they are always in the same place
and it's always the same time.

But not for us. For us there is a HERE and a THERE, a PAST and a FUTURE
so FOR US the information moves backwards in time and/or leaps across
vast distances without any care for a speed of light.

And it's correct. Our observations. According to Einstein, we are
correct. It did move back in time. For us. Not for the photon but for
us.










-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5