What is the best evidence for or against UFOs?

JTEM <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Sep 2025 16:47:31 -0400
Newsgroups alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors
Organization Eek
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Let's not play any games where people pretend that by UFOs
(UAVs, etc) they DON'T mean "Aliens from another planet."

You do.

Okay, so what is the best evidence FOR and AGAINST the
idea of UFOs buzzing the earth?

AGAINST:

The best evidence against it, for me, is that the narrative
sucks. It's on the level of folklore or even fairytales.
Claims aren't just inconsistent but competing.

WE'RE OVER SATURATED!

We don't just have aliens we have dozens and in some cases
HUNDREDS of alien species, and their various craft, all
buzzing the earth and all evading detection while at the
same time exposing themselves on a constant basis...

Then there's the fact that THE MILITARY is the very source
of UFO folklore.

Modern UFO folklore begins with Kennith Arnold and his
sighting of "Flying Saucers." BUT, and this is uber
important, he was lured to his place of sighting by the
military!  They had claimed that a plane crashed and
offered a hefty reward to any pilots who overflew the area
and found it. THAT is why Kennith Arnold was even there!

So the UFO narrative sucks out loud. It's an incoherent
mess that is self contradictory even during it's rare
moments of clarity.




-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5