What is the best evidence for or against UFOs?
JTEM <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Sep 2025 16:47:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors |
|---|---|
| Organization | Eek |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Let's not play any games where people pretend that by UFOs (UAVs, etc) they DON'T mean "Aliens from another planet." You do. Okay, so what is the best evidence FOR and AGAINST the idea of UFOs buzzing the earth? AGAINST: The best evidence against it, for me, is that the narrative sucks. It's on the level of folklore or even fairytales. Claims aren't just inconsistent but competing. WE'RE OVER SATURATED! We don't just have aliens we have dozens and in some cases HUNDREDS of alien species, and their various craft, all buzzing the earth and all evading detection while at the same time exposing themselves on a constant basis... Then there's the fact that THE MILITARY is the very source of UFO folklore. Modern UFO folklore begins with Kennith Arnold and his sighting of "Flying Saucers." BUT, and this is uber important, he was lured to his place of sighting by the military! They had claimed that a plane crashed and offered a hefty reward to any pilots who overflew the area and found it. THAT is why Kennith Arnold was even there! So the UFO narrative sucks out loud. It's an incoherent mess that is self contradictory even during it's rare moments of clarity. -- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5