Re: In Doc Trina Ted
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:23:04 +0200
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.sex,alt.answers.human-sexuality,talk.religion.newage,alt.anagrams,rec.puzzles |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Dalton <[email protected]> writes: > Wordplay: > > In the thread “The war on J.K. Rowling” > on alt.buddha.short.fat.guy , Noah Sombrero wrote > "The whole thing is much too complicated for me. How would I know > whether I have been indoctrinated?” > > and I replied > > "In Doc Trina Ted? Is Trina Ted two-spirit? :-)” A simple redivision of the letters into words is technically an anagram, but they're rarely of interest as they don't generally make much sense. E.g. see above. > Note that I define two-spirit differently from transgender. Youngsters bashed a cow! = Gay teaches bonus words = Bogus ten-yard showcase = Guess what, nobody cares. Phil -- We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization. -- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/