Law Enforcement

Lots of libtards claim to be anarchist but their ancap bullshit is 
half-assed at best. The idea private law enforcement is somehow 
practical is retarded. Now tbf I can understand how some workers' rights 
are pushed out by corporate and government monopolies' best interests, 
so a purely voluntary society has the same risks of a hegemonic culture 
as our own, thus many assume law enforcement for workers, consumers, 
business owners, and property must be in order. However, saying law 
enforcement is okay "minimally" is retarded authcel bullshit. That's 
like saying "a little" eugenics is okay. E.g. "Sure 99% of tendencies 
towards low-iq, poverty, harsh cultural standards, etc in certain racial 
groups is because of systemic disadvantage. But that 1% real genetic 
component simply can't be ignored!"

The reality is the same for the disadvantages criminals face. 5% of 
people commit all the crime. Most of it is property crime. Less than 1% 
is violent. Even in some contemporary cultures that rate is even lower 
due to various factors. So why imply we need a "just in case" rule. 
That's retarded, not because that isn't helpful in single cases, but 
because it would drive up distrust and thus overall crime rates, and we 
have to choose what biased group gets the community trust to make 
decisions based on precedent and principles over another humans 
freedoms. We can treat people without supposedly rehabilitative 
concentration camps that use indentured servitude and concentrated 
violence between members to incentivize non-recidivism. So no, we 
shouldn't be locking anyone up, nor any other retarded auth bullshit.