Re: Stevie Nicks (Fleetwood Mac) says abortion SAVED HER CAREER

On 2020-10-16 12:21 p.m., BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 10/16/20 8:47 AM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 8:59:33 PM UTC-4, Criminal Drivers 
>> Murder 35,000 Americans a Year wrote:
>>> Abortion should be mandatory for non-whites and banned for whites. 
>>> MAWA is our only hope.
>>>
>>> https://www.wnd.com/2020/10/stevie-nicks-thered-no-fleetwood-mac-not-abortion/ 
>>>
>>>
>>> oct 15 2020 (BREITBART) – After telling Variety that she's 
>>> contemplating leaving the United States if President Donald Trump 
>>> wins re-election, rocker Stevie Nicks says there wouldn't have been a 
>>> Fleetwood Mac if she had not had an abortion.
>>>
>>> "If I had not had that abortion, I'm pretty sure there would have 
>>> been no Fleetwood Mac," said Nick in a recent interview with The 
>>> Guardian. The singer ended her unborn child's life in 1979 while she 
>>> was dating Don Henley of The Eagles. "There's just no way that I 
>>> could have had a child then, working as hard as we worked constantly. 
>>> And there were a lot of drugs, I was doing a lot of drugs – I would 
>>> have had to walk away."
>>>
>>> Besides, Nicks felt that "the music we were going to bring to the 
>>> world" was much more important than the life of her own flesh and blood.
>>>
>> So if I understand her position, she prioritized music...and drugs, 
>> over human life.
>>
> There are people who kill all the time to rescue their life.... One is 
> about to get a new trial after he killed his "wife and fetus" just so he 
> could save his happiness.....  You remember Scott Peterson who killed 
> his wife and unborn baby?
> 
> 
> Now he can also rescue his career and his old love (girlfriend) that 
> other woman and all he had to do was kill two human lives which is akin 
> to having two abortions or one abortion that was twins.  We should 
> obviously feel good for Scott Peterson being set free and having 
> improved his life through abortion... We should have government programs 
> that offer help to pay for cement so that people like Scott Peterson can 
> make anchors to weigh down the body he dumps in the ocean, since it's 
> legal to kill the human life in the uterus then he should have a new law 
> named after him *The Scott Peterson* abort your wife law that makes 
> aborting your pregnant wife legal *just like abortion is* because it 
> crimps the man's life style and their career and makes him number three 
> on the list of importance and drains his income.
> 
> If it's OK for women to kill a human life or two to make their life 
> better for all those reasons, why is it NOT legal for a man to kill a 
> human life or two to make their life better...
> 
> Men might consider starting a FUND to help SCOTT PETERSON and to also 
> turn that into a FUND that tries to pass a law or find a RIGHT in the 
> Constitution to allow a man to kill his responsibilities like a woman 
> can kill her responsibilities that are HUMAN LIFE in her uterus.....
> 
> It just seems like it's equal....  and fair. If women can do it why NOT 
> the man.  It's just a human life, and Liberal Doctors at Planned 
> Parenthood kill human lives inside the uterus for the women every day.
> 
> I know that some women might call it barbaric to allow men to kill a 
> human life that is depending on them and trusting them to care for them 
> but what do other people call what women do to a human life in a uterus 
> at an abortion....?

Human life is not all that fucking important. Humans are a plague on the 
earth.