Fuckwit David Harrison - *Gloo* - No consideration for animals' lives
George Plimpton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.zen,alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.philosophy,talk.politics.animals,alt.philosophy.zen |
|---|---|
| Organization | Easynews - www.easynews.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The lying cracker, Goo Fuckwit David Harrison, continually blabbers about
having "consideration" for the lives of animals. What he means is, he
thinks it's good for the animals themselves if they exist. That's *all* it
means.
He sure as hell doesn't have one bit of consideration for their lives as
animals experience them, i.e., for their welfare. He has made that
abundantly clear over 11 years:
It's not out of consideration for porcupines
that we don't raise them for food. It's because
they would be a pain in the ass to raise. We
don't raise cattle out of consideration for them
either, but because they're fairly easy to
raise.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sep 26, 2005
I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought
that all of the animals I eat had terrible
lives, I would still eat meat. That is not
because I don't care about them at all, but I
would just ignore their suffering.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Nov 29, 1999
I would eat animals even if I thought that it was
cruel to them, and even if they gained nothing from
the deal. Is that what you want me to say? It is true.
But that doesn't mean that I can't still like the animals
also....
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sept 23, 1999
I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care enough
to make the effort.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - July 31, 2003
Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly meat,
but also disgusting animal combats that Goo enjoys watching.