Re: Stevie Nicks (Fleetwood Mac) says abortion SAVED HER CAREER

On 2020-10-27 8:45 a.m., BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 10/27/20 4:00 AM, Dutch wrote:
>> On 2020-10-26 1:13 p.m., BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>> On 10/26/20 3:12 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>> On 2020-10-26 7:29 a.m., BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some human lives are worthwhile, yours seems like a big waste.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The HATE is strong in this one.... may the HATE be with you.
>>>>
>>>> It's hard not to hate what humans have done to this beautiful planet.
>>>
>>> Asteroids and Gama Ray Bursts and ice ages and other things will do 
>>> worse.
>>>
>>> it's NOT really logical to hate a non entity that is just adhering to 
>>> the laws of the universe.
>>
>> I didn't say I hated asteroids.
> 
> Are you stupid or something? I didn't say you did I said hating humanity 
> is like hating an asteroid which is just an entity a thing that exists 
> according the the physical laws of the universe and all could do similar 
> damage .
> 
> I said hating humanity and you clearly do hate humanity, is not logical 
> unless you also hate other things like an asteroid that will result in 
> the same kind of damage of extinctions and deaths and destruction of 
> life as it was 10,000 years ago.

So humans causing death and destruction is the equivalent of a natural 
disaster? What a brain-dead idea.

> 
> You do know hat even a super volcano could create atmospheric changes 
> and little ice ages and deserts and areas that are lifeless and spew 
> toxins (or at least what you think of as toxins).  SO since you're 
> basing this on your opinions it all in youe head and it's NOT reality 
> because in reality the universe could do worse to the planet on any 
> given day so every day is a chance for the universe to make humanity 
> look like a bothersome gnat as the universe wipes out part or all of the 
> planets "charms" that you seem to think have more of a place here than 
> humanity.

That was an incomprehensible word salad.

> I'm suspecting that something is broken in your mind and you need to 
> look for some kind of psychological help.

I suspect that you are beyond help.

>> Your logic is like saying that I shouldn't hate violent pedophiles who 
>> only kill a few children when there are others who kill lots.
>>
>> Another thing, you're against abortion right? Well, nature flushes 
>> fertilized eggs all the time. It's not logical to hate nature.
> 
> Again The LAWS OF THE Universe limit the actions and I didn't claim that 
> GOD or the laws of physics doesn't allow abortion, it's simple a respect 
> for human life. We accept that human life has RIGHTS called inalienable 
> RIGHTS and that in order for humans, when there are more than two and 
> since it takes two for there to be a species, that when two humans are 
> present IN THE UNITED STATES that they have inalienable RIGHTS.... among 
> those are the RIGHT to LIFE LIBERTY and the RIGHT to property, so the 
> largest can't just kill and steal and makes slaves of the weaker.
> 
> You seem to have a problem with the scientifically accepted point when 
> human life begins.  It begins when the science tells us it begins, and 
> that seems to be when the DNA combines to form the complete DNA of a 
> unique human life.

Where did you get the idea that I don't know that? What is not settled 
is when a human life becomes a person with the full protection of the state.

> Will that include man made clones, that will be for science to tackle 
> but they appear to be human (homosapiens) and alive.

What about frozen embryos? What about the fertilized eggs flushed out in 
a woman's monthly cycle, should the state intervene to protect them?