Re: Why do Hartung and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness engage in so much ad hominem?
Kurt Nicklas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.california,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian |
|---|---|
| Organization | Rudella "The Senile, Incel Usenet Dwarf" Canoza School of Fisticuffs and Frantic Retreat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:33:35 -0800, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> wrote: >On 1/26/2022 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:34:06 -0000 (UTC), Vance <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 25 Jan 2022, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some >>> news:[email protected]: >>> >>>> This morning, Lee <[email protected]> posted something and cited >>>> Rolling Stone as the source. Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness >>>> bleated (as her sole commentary): >>>> >>>> "Rolling Stone.....hah! " >>> >>> Rolling Stone = Left wing biased homosexual publication. Look it up. >>> >>>> That's /ad hominem/. Why does the stupid trailer trash bitch think >>>> that's reasonable commentary, and *any* form of rebuttal? >>>> >>>> Hartung does the same thing all the time. >>> >>> The difference is they question the source. > >No. They reject the *article* because they dislike the source, because they're >little bitches. > > >>> >>> You on the other hand attack the person. >> >> Rudely doesn't understand that there's a difference. > >You don't understand what /ad hominem/ is. Lee posted an article from Rolling >Stone that details a Republiscum/QAnon attempt to steal the election in Arizona. > You didn't refute a word of it. All you did was denigrate the news source >that published it. That's /ad hominem/, plain and simple. > >The above paragraph is an argument. If I change the first sentence to read "You >don't understand what /ad hominem/ is, you dumb bitch," I have not engaged in >/ad hominem/. Calling someone a name is not /ad hominem/ /per se/. It's only >/ad hominem/ if the name-calling is the only thing I write. > >Note, you dumb bitch: "Rolling Stone.....hah!" Is not an argument. It's /ad >hominem/, you dumb bitch. No, dwarf, it is not. Find a good Latin dictionary and look up the word "hominus". No, not "hominem" because "hominem" is the accusative form and you're to stupid, fat and ignorant to understand declension. A magazine is not a man. Remember that.