Re: Why do Hartung and Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness engage in so much ad hominem?
NoBody <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.california,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:51:31 +0200, Kurt Nicklas <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:33:35 -0800, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>On 1/26/2022 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote: >>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:34:06 -0000 (UTC), Vance <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 25 Jan 2022, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some >>>> news:[email protected]: >>>> >>>>> This morning, Lee <[email protected]> posted something and cited >>>>> Rolling Stone as the source. Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness >>>>> bleated (as her sole commentary): >>>>> >>>>> "Rolling Stone.....hah! " >>>> >>>> Rolling Stone = Left wing biased homosexual publication. Look it up. >>>> >>>>> That's /ad hominem/. Why does the stupid trailer trash bitch think >>>>> that's reasonable commentary, and *any* form of rebuttal? >>>>> >>>>> Hartung does the same thing all the time. >>>> >>>> The difference is they question the source. >> >>No. They reject the *article* because they dislike the source, because they're >>little bitches. >> >> >>>> >>>> You on the other hand attack the person. >>> >>> Rudely doesn't understand that there's a difference. >> >>You don't understand what /ad hominem/ is. Lee posted an article from Rolling >>Stone that details a Republiscum/QAnon attempt to steal the election in Arizona. >> You didn't refute a word of it. All you did was denigrate the news source >>that published it. That's /ad hominem/, plain and simple. >> >>The above paragraph is an argument. If I change the first sentence to read "You >>don't understand what /ad hominem/ is, you dumb bitch," I have not engaged in >>/ad hominem/. Calling someone a name is not /ad hominem/ /per se/. It's only >>/ad hominem/ if the name-calling is the only thing I write. >> >>Note, you dumb bitch: "Rolling Stone.....hah!" Is not an argument. It's /ad >>hominem/, you dumb bitch. > >No, dwarf, it is not. Find a good Latin dictionary and look up the >word "hominus". No, not "hominem" because "hominem" is the accusative >form and you're to stupid, fat and ignorant to understand declension. > >A magazine is not a man. Remember that. And Rudely is not a man either. Remember that.