Re: 14 States Teach Creationism

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:16:58 -0500, aaa <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 2022-02-03 10:43 a.m., Tim wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> "aaa" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On 2022-02-03 10:02 a.m., Tim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "aaa" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> On 2022-02-03 9:15 a.m., Tim wrote:
>>>>>> On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 9:09:18 AM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-02-03 4:17 a.m., Tim wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:38:13 PM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-02 6:33 p.m., Tim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 6:04:53 PM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-02 12:34 p.m., Tim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 12:12:53 PM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-02 11:14 a.m., Tim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:01:41 AM UTC-5, aaa 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-02 9:31 a.m., Tim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:26:27 AM UTC-5, aaa 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-02 9:20 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-01 10:37 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 9:44:43 PM UTC-5, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-01 9:27 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-01 8:51 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-01 12:35 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-01-31 10:44 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-01-31 9:30 p.m., Mitchell Holman 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:st9ic7$ebq$1@dont-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-01-31 1:56 p.m., Mitchell Holman 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:st8qfr$rbm$2@dont-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-01-31 4:05 a.m., 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, January 31, 2022 at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:40:54 AM UTC+8, aaa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-01-30 9:56 p.m., Mitchell 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aaa <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-01-30 11:10 a.m., John 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Locke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 04:38:05 -0800 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (PST), Viktor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tandofsky
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mic.com/articles/80179/14-states-use- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ta
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dollars-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to-t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each -creationism-in-public-schools
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...teaching creationism as if it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were science in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> school
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classroom has been found to be a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violation of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US Constitution. They can teach it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the public
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> school as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history or comparative religions 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or even as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're trying to undermine 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> science with religious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're in violation of he law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Creationism is a perfect 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophical theory of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be taught in every philosophy class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually you are right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Teach in philosophy class, teach it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in religion class, but DON'T teach 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a science class. It is not science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a problem if you ban evolution 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the philosophical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theory pretending to be science from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all science
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classes as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What philosophy you wish to have in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a pixie in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your possession?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God's philosophy is the real philosophy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is "God's philosophy"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And no, "go read your Bible"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not an answer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God's philosophy teaches us God's eternal 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What "truth" is that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us in your own words.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All spiritual things are indescribable. You 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experience it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand it. There is nothing I can do. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only Jesus Christ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experience the truth, so you should begin 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a God want his "eternal truth"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be indescribable?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not just the truth. All those spiritual 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things in my signature
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are indescribable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they cannot be described they cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be obeyed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since they are all found in the heart, one only 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to obey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heart.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just like suicide bombers do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suicide bombers don't have hearts. They are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heartless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Bible is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> textbook of God's philosophy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you lied when you said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What lie are you talking about? God 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directed the ancient
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jews to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Bible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where did God say that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show us the passage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God didn't have to say that. It's common 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You post claim after claim about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "what God says" and "what the Bible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says" and then run away EVERY TIME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are asked for proof.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are only my personal understandings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "A personal understanding is no different from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a claim. It still needs to be proven first."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "aaa", March 28 2018
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/y99wc8f2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal understandings are perfectly logical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So personal understandings "need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be proven first".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for the ones YOU post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gads what a hypocrite you are.........
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since it's logical, it's already proven by logic. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too bad you can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refute my personal understanding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! His "personal understanding".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a perfect example of the sort of mental 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gymnastics in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circular logic these loons are capable of.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If he believes it it is logical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If he posts it you have to disprove it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In all things he is "automatically right"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is your proof to show otherwise?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to prove it. It's my logical conclusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have not shown your logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't know logic if it came up and slapped you in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> th eface.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another empty claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Says the guy who has nothing but empty claims.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You only prove your total lack of understanding again
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I just pointed out yours.
>>>>>>>>>>> You are the only clueless one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nope, you tandy and stephany nash have cornered that market.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Another empty claim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, just three empty heads. Or two empty ones and a broken one. 
>>>>>>>> Your choice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are still the clueless one...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too bad you have a broken head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, it's more efficient than your clueless one.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> It's only efficient at producing word salad. And no one has a clue as 
>>>> to what the fuck your word salad is supposed to accomplish.
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So says the clueless one.
>>>
>>> :-)
>> 
>> Says the guy with the broken head!
>> 
>> :-)
>
>Personal attack only proves your lack of argument.

Exactly.

>
>:-)
>
>> 
>>