Re: [NEWS] Jim Carrey in talks to play live-action George Jetson
Your Name <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:23:31 +1300
| Newsgroups | alt.animation.warner-bros,rec.arts.animation,rec.arts.movies.current-films |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-10-16 15:36:19 +0000, Paul S Person said: > On 16 Oct 2025 02:39:29 GMT, [email protected] (Ted Nolan > <tednolan>) wrote: >> In article <[email protected]>, >> Your Name <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> A Jetson's live-action movie was likely to be awful (although >>> The>>Flinstones live-action movies are probably the >>> few>>animated-to-live-action movies that actually get close to being >>> any>>good!) ... but, with the abysmal Jim Carrey in the lead role, >>> this>>live-action "The Jetsons" movie is 1000% guaranteed to be >>> utter>>garbage. :-\ >> >> Jim Carrey is 63. That's way too old to play a guy with an elemntary >> school kid. > > Apparently, the concept of "makeup" escapes you. These days it's more often CGI / "de-aging" software. > And also, perhaps, that of "acting". Well, it *is* Jim Carrey ... he *can't* act. All he ever does is pull silly rubber-faces and shout a lot. :-\ > Part of the magic of movies is seeing actors (successfully) playing > characters you would never expect them to be able to. > > Although I would agree it is easier to do this the other way around: > young actor, old character -- as in /Scrooge/, for example. > > And, anyway, he could be a 63-year-old with a grade-school grandson. > You may be ignoring the way stories can change as the film is > developed.