[Spam] Re: Subject: Re: [Spam] Re: Unveiling the NSA's Dark Secret: Infiltration of TOR Users

On 11 Jan 2026, Nym Mailer <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]: 

> Q-User once wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 09:51:50 +0100, you wrote:
>> > 
>> > On 09 Jan 2026, Nym Mailer <[email protected]> posted some
>> > news:[email protected]:
>> > 
>> > > Hi QSL users,
>> > > 
>> DEL
>> > > 
>> > > Remember, Nym Mailer and NymVPN is much much easier to use
>> > > than QSL with outdated and 30 years old TypeII technology.
>> 
>> Horseshit!  QSL/Tor still is secure if you follow the correct 
>> instructions.
>>
>> Tell me when and where it was supposedly "broken".  It still has all 
>> the security needed by the average poster who is not a terrorist or 
>> criminal.  Yeah, there is Super-Duper Paranoid new stuff, but it's 
>> for the SUPER-PARANOIDS only.
> 
> Oh my god, when will you QSL users understand that an ISP and their
> TLAs can *exactly* see when *you* have sent Type II packets through

None of you "Type II packet" conspiracy dopes have a single clue what 
you're yammering about.  Odds are you've never even read the protocol 
spec involved and it's clear you know nothing of the OSI layers.

> the Tor network? This does not mean that they will automatically knock
> at your door, when doing some "anon" mailing. You simply move into
> their large database for later reference, in case it's required.

So what?  They can see all packets and have content filtering to catch 
the kiddie porn addicts, script kiddies, malware, etc.  

> BTW. Nym users, which are many many thousands, are average users too.
> They only enjoy modern technology and the Nym team is great with all
> it's new developments and Nym software components are all open source.
> 
> Last but not least, try to use a 'References:' header with the
> <Message-ID> from the posting you like to reply.