Re: PrivacyTools.io Uses Censorship to Protect Protonmail
Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:40:48 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.anonymous, alt.anonymous.email, alt.cypherpunks, mail.cypherpunks |
|---|---|
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]> Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote: > > The privacy-watchdog site which exposed Proton Mail has been taken > down. I'm going to post in a.p.a-s some of the informative articles > from the site. > > The privacy-watchdog site which exposed Proton Mail has been taken > down. > > I'm going to post in a.p.a-s some of the informative articles from the > site. > > https://privacy-watchdog.io/privacytools-io-censors-true-information/ > > PrivacyTools.io Uses Censorship to Protect Protonmail > by Watchdog > > September 24, 2019 > > > Short Summary: > > Privacytools used censorship to protect Protonmail on Reddit > PrivacyTools references a blog post that is mostly non-related. > Is PrivacyTools still credible? > > Detailed Analysis: > > 1. Privacytools.io Used Censorship to Protect Protonmail > > Privacy-Watchdog.io posted two properly cited articles on the > subreddit r/privacytools. In response, the forum moderator, trai_dep, > censored the two posts by deleting them from the subreddit. They > suggested I post to r/conspiracy until I could find reputable sources > to support my claims. Heres the problem: Protonmail statements are > my primary source. Lets review the two articles and citations below: > > Privacy-Watchdog Post: Protonmails false claim list > Sources Used: 7 citations from Protonmail, 1 from Reuters, 1 from > Vice & 1 from Professor Nadim Kobeissi > Privacy-Watchdog Post: Protonmails Crowdfunding & Equity Sale > Sources Used: 8 Citations from Protonmail, 3 from Protonmails > Twitter, 1 from Forbes and 1 From BleepingComputer. > > If you do an analysis on Privacytools.io historical article & source > approval history, youll find these are more than adequate. > 2. PrivacyTools References a Mostly Non-Related Reddit Page > > Privacytools.io stated: Visit this post to read r/Protonmails > responses to these unsourced claims (archive) . So lets take a look > at where Privacytools directed me, its a Reddit post that I created > where I ask Protonmail 4 questions: > > Question: How much code was written at MIT? > Protonmail Eventually Responded: Wei Sun, Protonmails Cryptography & > Computer science major during their creation, wrote his portion of the > code at MIT in an NSA/CIA funded department. > Question: Has Protonmail provided a response to the US/Swiss MLAT > treaty? > Protonmail Response: ProtonMail only responds to orders which have > been approved by a Swiss court. > > Question: How much equity does CRV and FONGIT have? > Protonmail Response: CRV & FONGIT own less than 20%. > > Question: Does Protonmail maintain any close connections with current > Gmail/Google employees? If so, what information is shared? > > Protonmail Response: Protonmail received help from a Google Engineer > during their DDOS attack in 2015. > > For PrivacyTools.io to reference this blog post illustrates they did > not read the post. What likely happened was Protonmail provided > Privacytools.io with the response PM wanted Privacytools to make. Then > Privacytools copy/pasted that response to me without any fact-checking > whatsoever. > > 2. Is PrivacyTools still credible? > > Privacytools.io Github shows there is an 8 person team that maintains > their website. Their GitHub profile reveals that some of their key > creators, like Shifterovich, use Protonmail. Their Patreon page shows > they earn $11/month from donations. Protonmail is a million-dollar > company with questionable ethics. Is it possible that Protonmail makes > donations to PrivacyTools in return for censoring information in their > behalf? Thats impossible to know for certain however an analysis of > the facts show that Privacytools.io utilized censorship to hide > harmful/true information about Protonmail. Censoring the truth should > never be done especially by a website like Privacytools.io. > > I am just an old defense contractor, with PTSD, running a shitty > wordpress site. Privacytools.io and Protonmails girly games dont > affect me at all. However, I had a friend who was harmed because of a > data security issue. Every day I remember that experience in perfect > detail. I dont have fucking patience to fuck around with censorship > or favoritism. Someone could get hurt because they misunderstood their > security tools. > > Privacytools.io gives advice to many people seeking privacy & > security. My concern is someone could get hurt because Privacytools.io > censored truth for a company that sends them donations. In closing I > will quote PrivacyTools website: Never trust any company with your > privacy. Based on their actions maybe you shouldnt trust > Privacytools.io either. > Privacy Watchdog > > Contact me via Email or Reddit > > (dead link) > https://privacy-watchdog.io/privacytools-io-censors-true- > information/[email protected] > > (More info and posts regarding Proton Mail) > https://www.reddit.com/user/Privacy-Watchdog Adding interested groups.