[Spam] Re: Who needs all this Super-Duper Anon Header Crap?
anonymous <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:14:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.cypherpunks,alt.snorky,alt.anonymous |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 19 Nov 2025, Radio Eriwan <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]: > Nomen Nescio once wrote: >> On 18 Nov 2025, Radio Eriwan <[email protected]> posted some >> news:[email protected]: >> >> > Fritz Wuehler once wrote: >> > >> > > Why should the average non-criminal user give a rat's butt about >> > > fixed size or any of the other nonsense mentioned above? This is >> > > Usenet, and apa-s is about how the average user's posts can stay >> > > anonymous. >> > >> > >> > Hey, are you that stupid or are you just pretending? Anyone who does >> > DPI sees in the Tor network that with fixed-size padding, through >> > Mixmaster or YAMN packets, it's Bob who uses OmniMix, while Alice >> > remains invisible to inspectors with adaptive padding. >> >> So? DPI means nothing if you can't decrypt the data blocks B2E. >> > > The good thing about this is that you don't need to decrypt any blocks; > instead, you can determine with certainty who is using OmniMix. or a browser, email, streaming, torrent, etc.