Re: Fat Tubby Ordered to Cough Up Cash to Stormy Daniels
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism |
|---|---|
| Organization | idiocracy.gov |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/30/20 12:38 AM, Gronk wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> On Sunday, August 23, 2020 at 10:57:18 AM UTC-4, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>> On 8/22/20 3:14 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>> In his decision this week, Judge Robert Broadbelt III ruled that >>>> Clifford was entitled to legal fees, finding her the "prevailing >>>> party" under California law, despite the case having been dismissed. >>> >>> >>> Legal fees for hiring a lawyer >> >> You got it. Wow, a real fluke that a light bulb went on in your dark, >> hollow brain. >> > And they said he was stupid. A bit dense. A moron, even. I though the original case was that TRUMP paid her money already to sign a NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT that Stormy wanted to violate so she could make millions selling the story? how would that be TRUMPS responsibility to pay for an attorney for Stormy to break the NON disclosure agreement? And wasn't the BIG deal that the Democrats said that TRUMP paid Story Daniels for the sex, so why is she back trying to extort more money and why is the Judiciary assisting in an extortion plot that Stormy Daniels lawyer was charged with and then later found guilty of another extortion charge by "NIKE" shoe corporation? Is the Judiciary really going to allow the Lawyers and Judges to run wild and undermine the rule of law? And they're doing it all in the name of politics. NOT a good look for Justice is it? -- *That's Karma* Democrats have no VISION to help make a MORE PERFECT UNION, all they have is HATE for America and Americans.