Re: Born alive executive order

On 9/26/20 12:08 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Friday, September 25, 2020 at 11:23:16 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 9/25/20 9:23 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 25, 2020 at 10:01:21 PM UTC-4, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> On 9/25/20 9:52 AM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, September 24, 2020 at 12:18:53 PM UTC-4, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/23/trump-sign-executive-o
>>>>>>>> rder-requiring-all-babies-bo/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> President Trump announced on Wednesday that he will sign an executive
>>>>>>>> order to ensure that all babies born alive receive medical care,
>>>>>>>> including those that survive abortions or are born prematurely.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In an appeal to religious voters, the president made the disclosure
>>>>>>>> during a pre-recorded virtual address to the National Catholic Prayer
>>>>>>>> Breakfast.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> “Today I am announcing that I will be signing the born alive
>>>>>>>> executive order to assure that all precious babies born alive, no
>>>>>>>> matter their circumstances, receive the medical care that they
>>>>>>>> deserve,” the president said. “This is our sacrosanct moral
>>>>>>>> duty.” [...]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you Mr. President.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that apply to the children
>>>>>>> dying in his border "detention" camps"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/y58hnlcj
>>>>>> I'm curious what in the US Code allows him usuep the state laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>> He'll probably just apply Amendment XIV...just like progressives/leftist-liberals/Democrats
>>>>> do for almost everything.
>>>>>
>>>> I pointed out Amend 5 and 13  as examples against a human life being
>>>> ended or enslaved without due process and/or a criminal conviction.
>>>>
>>>> In amend 5 it says right to life NOT right to persons whom are alive,
>>>
>>>
>>> You stupid fuck.  The 5th applies to protections a citizen has in criminal or legal proceedings against him or her.  The right to life is meshed with liberty and property, not separate from it.  Fetuses never have criminal or legal proceedings against them nor do they have liberty to do as they please within the confines of laws or have property they own.  You stupid fuck.
>>
>>>> so
>>>> the USSC made a huge error when they read it as saying person rather
>>>> than "LIFE" as in (life,liberty and property) that due to the life in
>>>> the uterus NOT being a person as defined by the court that just said
>>>> that a life in the uterus was not proof that it was a person as the 14th
>>>> Amend says, so the Democrats and the USSC got their interpretation all
>>>> screwed up and they contradicted themselves.
>>>
>>>
>>> You stupid fuck.  So long as a fetus is physically attached to its mother for survival, it's not a person, it's a fetus.  It only obtains personhood once separated from the mother and becomes a viable, independent, living, breathing (it doesn't breathe while encased in a sac of amniotic fluid) being in its own right, so it has no Constitutional rights as a non-breathing adjunct of the mother who does have Constitutional rights.  You stupid fuck.
>>
>> According to what law?
> 
> Are you being a stupid fuck too by not following the discussion and what it's about? 

All you need to do is show me a law that says a human life can only be 
alive by actually inhaling air on their own.

Those paralyzed and with other medical problems like the China Virus 
will be sad to know they have no RIGHTS to life when they're using a 
respirator or sleeping and using a CPAP machine for night time 
breathing, since they're connected to the electric company to keep them 
alive.

In fact the law says that the ELECTRIC COMPANY can't simply disconnect 
you and your medical breathing device and let you die. In Fact there are 
a lot of medical devices that fall under that law.  But you suggest that 
it's OK for a LIBERAL doctor to disconnect and kill a human life that 
has zero medical problems?

If Doctors are about health why are they "treating" the human life in 
the uterus if it's healthy? That doesn't say much for Liberal doctors 
who took an oath to do no harm.


-- 
That's Karma


                      *Mama'says*
203 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQ6Tr_ySjcA
Why do we have an Admitted Mentally ill woman (Ilhan Omar) who is 
probably admitting she should NOT legally be allowed to own or carry a 
gun, voting on gun laws and laws pertaining to mental illness when she 
herself is admittedly suffering a mental problem related to guns and war.

Sure I sympathize with her being in a war zone when she was young, if 
that's what she is claiming but then I have to ask, if she is having 
issues with her own psychological stability due to the specter of war, 
is she really mentally fit to be in the Congress where they're the 
people who would vote to *DECLARE WAR* ?