Re: "The Equality Act"
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.politics.trump,talk.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Don't feed the animals |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/26/21 10:31 AM, Mighty Wannabe wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote on 2021-02-26 9:28 AM: >> Otherwise Tibet Monks could force you to make their Wedding cakes with >> "Yak Butter". >> >> > > Tibetan monks are Buddhist monks. Much like Orthodox Christian monks and > Catholic priests, Buddhist monks are required to be celibate (no pussy > bonking). So there is no such thing as "Wedding cakes for Tibetan Monks". > > > > Do they discriminate against gays? Are there no gay monks or gay Buddhists...? And I was actually inferring that "Buddhists" still marry.... Much as the Rabbi is the one that forces the Jews to eat according to the Jewish RELIGION edicts the Buddhist monks insist that the Buddhists eat the diet of the Buddhists which probbably doesn't include killing animals but I'm NOT-SURE if that includes milk/butter from animals. Hence the problem with the Government mandating that a Bakery make a cake according to religious edicts. And while gays claim to be a different type of person they want special gay stuff for them as if it were a religion. And it may well be a religion but it certainly isn't a different type of person proven by DNA and science to be something other than a typical heterosexual with an abnormal mental disorder that has caused sexual/ social-disorientation. And be they a Buddhist gay or an Atheist gay, they still aren't scientifically proven gay. Which may mean it's a religion all it's own or a mental illness. -- That's karma Banning guns and de-funding police won't lower crime if you follow the Democrats Rhetoric. *And their very own Democrat actions confirm* that even *they believe they're lying* since they're doing the opposite *to* *reduce any crimes "you" might commit against the Government* that they control and apparently they *believe guns and fences and police* *will* *protect* them from your crime and violence. So why won't those same things protect you from crime and violence?