Re: Why wouldn't a single right-wingnut here condemn Trump's attempt to steal the election?
"Rudy Canoza" <j_carlson@neodome> Sat, 24 Apr 2021 11:39:15 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.politics.trump,talk.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.trump,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.politics,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Neodome |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > On 4/24/21 2:59 AM, Ted wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:46:09 -0700, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> "I just want to find 11,780 votes," Trump said to Brad > > Raffensperger. This was > >> on January 2 of this year, after the electoral college had sat, > > after all > >> states' electoral votes had been transmitted to the National > > Archives. It was > >> blatant election fraud. It is criminal. > > > > > >> Not ONE right-wingnut here condemned it — not Hartung, not Gak, > > not Kremlin > >> Girl, not #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, not "Salty Stan"/Sanitary > > Napkin/"Slackjaw". > >> Not a single one. > > > > > >> Then Trump's insurrection mob violently > >> invaded the Capitol. > > > > > >> And right-wingnuts claim that they are the "law and order" side. > > No, > >> Republiscums/GOP/QAnon right-wingnuts > >> are the party of gleeful criminality. > > > > > > > > These cretins are just blindly loyal to what > > they regard as their tribe. You see it with the > > libtards too. It's despicable. > > *Democrats FAKE narrative about who is attempting to steal elections* > is *upside down* like their policies of defunding the police while > RIOTERS BURN THE CITIES and having open borders while mandating a > PANDEMIC lock-down and most all of your recent Democrat policies. No.