Re: Vaccine Mandates Are Legal And Effective

On 8/6/21 1:09 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 8/6/21 11:17 AM, Lee wrote:
>>
>> Vaccine Mandates Are Lawful, Effective
>> and Based on Rock-Solid Science
>> Aug 5
>>
>> The U.S. has reached a worrying plateau
>> in its COVID-19 vaccination coverage,
>> with just half of the population fully
>> vaccinated. This coincides with pandemic
>> fatigue, or weak compliance with COVID-19
>> risk-mitigation measures such as masking
>> and distancing, and the highly infectious
>> Delta variant, which accounts for more
>> than 83 percent of infections. We’re at
>> an inflection point in the pandemic, with
>> coronavirus infections soaring by about
>> 140 percent in the past two weeks.
>>
>> Reflecting deep concern over lagging
>> vaccinations, the Biden dministration
>> recently mandated vaccinations for all
>> federal workers and contractors (with
>> masking and regular testing as an
>> alternative option), while the
>> Department of Veterans Affairs issued
>> mandates for all frontline health
>> workers at its facilities. President
>> Joe Biden also ordered the military to
>> move toward compulsory vaccinations.
>>
>> California, New York City and New York
>> State are leading the way in requiring
>> that government workers get vaccinated
>> or else submit to weekly testing. And
>> New York City just announced its “Key
>> to NYC Pass,” requiring proof of
>> vaccination for access to most indoor
>> activities, including gyms, restaurants
>> and performances, beginning on September
>> 13—the first policy of its kind in the
>> U.S. Meanwhile more hospitals and long-
>> term care facilities are implementing
>> mandates following a joint statement
>> from 100 medical and nursing groups
>> urging compulsory vaccinations. And when
>> schools of higher education return in
>> the fall, nearly 600 colleges and
>> universities will require vaccination.
>> That’s true in the private sector as
>> well as a rising tide of businesses—
>> including Uber, Facebook, Google,
>> Netflix and Delta Air Lines—mandate
>> vaccinations for workers.
>>
>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/vaccine-mandates-are-lawful-e
>> ffective-and-based-on-rock-solid-science/
> 
> A good article.
> 
> We have all sorts of immunization mandates in place, why not this?

It's unconstitutional in the United States to force citizens to ingest
things, in fact I'll go so far as to say it's like waterboarding and
RAPE and the Government neither has the power to RAPE it's citizens nor
the power to waterboard it's citizens.

And before you say "it's NOT torture", I'll say you aren't a parent
because injecting your kids or family with some strange DNA is a form of
torture for that family, let me tell you that only a person without a
conscience (which is a Sociopath) would think that it's NOT torture.

Having an unknown untested injection from a GOVERNMENT that you can't
trust to hold free and fair elections or tell you the truth forced on
you or your kids... that is torture.

And if they do it to you, we call that RAPE...

All the corporations willing to mandate that you get the vaccine are
RAPING YOU just as sure as any assault here you're coerced or forced
into having someone inject foreign things into your body.

IN the case of businesses it's also extortion because they're using the
threat of you paycheck being taken away to force you to comply with
their RAPE of your body.

The average RAPIST would spend time in prison for those very same actions.

If a marriage license can't force you to marry the opposite sex how can
a medical license force you to allow the GOVERNMENT to RAPE YOU and
inject it's GOVERNMENT APPROVED RNA/DNA when a RAPIST will be sent to
prison for that very same act of violating your body?


That's Karma

*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*
Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them prove it with
actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't find the
duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then you didn't
dig deep enough. The *Gruber Doctrine* is the Marxist-Democrat plan that
says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have a lack of transparency and
then lie about everything".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G790p0LcgbI



*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*
173 -  If a marriage license can *NOT* tell you who *you* *must*
*engage* *in* *marriage* *with* depending on their sexual identity
(Because it's unconstitutional) how can a business license tell you
*who* *you* *must* *engage* *in* *commerce* *with* depending on their
sexual identity?  Is it or isn't it UNCONSTITUTIONAL for government to
use a license to mandate or limit participation depending on sexual
identity...?