Re: Paying For Being Anti-Vaxx

On 8/20/21 10:44 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>  | ...
>  | In the last few months, the environment has shifted with
>  | safe and highly effective vaccines now widely available.

They mean risky "vaccines" with no long term testing done for the many
possible side effects giving it special FDA permission to be used and is
now likely to be a mandated mRNA injection that they call a "vaccine" to
deceive people as to what they really are and the FACT that with that
*EXPERIMENTAL* type of re-creating the spike gene to try to block the
virus you don't gain immunity but rather you block your own immune
system from creating your own immunity....?


And that is leaving you wide open to the virus once it can mutate to a
strain that infects you then you have no immunity what so ever.

By getting the vaccine it is looking more and more like you are shutting
off your immune system's ability to protect you from future strains of
the virus and possiby may other types of viruses which may be mutated in
the laboratory or in nature to create a strain that infects the cell in
additional ways to that spiked protein.  It may do other things to your
immune system as well.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/figures/mm7031e2-F1.gif


More people who were fully vaccinated were testing positive for the
virus than people who were not vaccinated

The CDC is saying that the vaccine is NOT effective, with their very own
graph.











-- 
That's Karma

*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*
Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them prove it with
actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't find the
duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then you didn't
dig deep enough. The *Gruber Doctrine* is the Marxist-Democrat plan that
says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have a lack of transparency and
then lie about everything".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G790p0LcgbI



*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*
203 - https://youtu.be/0ESPyYBfdXo?t=250
Ask why we have an Admitted Mentally ill woman (Ilhan Omar) who is
probably admitting she should NOT legally be allowed to own or carry a
gun, vote on gun laws and laws pertaining to mental illness when she
herself is admittedly suffering a mental problem related to guns and war.

Sure you can sympathize with her being in a war zone when she was young,
if that's what she is claiming but then you have to ask, if she is
having issues with her own psychological stability due to the specter of
war, is she really fit to be in the Congress where they're the people
who would vote to *DECLARE WAR* ?