Re: "Sotomayor tells law students: I can't change Texas abortion law, but you can"

BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Oct 2021 08:10:29 -0400
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.economics,talk.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.economics,alt.philosophy,alt.politics.constitution,alt.politics.usa,talk.politics.guns,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.politics.trump ,talk.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism
Organization Censorship of this document in part or in whole is an admission of your belonging to a VIOLENT HATE GROUP.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/2/21 9:53 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/574745-sotomayor-tells-law-students-i-cant-change-texas-abortion-law-but
> 
> 
> [...]
> Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor told an audience of law students
> on Wednesday that while her power to overturn a restrictive Texas
> abortion law is limited, the public wields the power to force change,
> CNN reported.
> 
> The Texas abortion legislation, which took effect about a month ago,
> banned almost all abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, or
> about six weeks into a pregnancy. In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court
> refused to block the new law from being enacted, but did not decide on
> its constitutionality.
> 
> "You know, I can't change Texas's law," Sotomayor said. "But you can,
> and everyone else who may or may not like it can go out there and be
> lobbying forces in changing laws that you don't like."
> 
> Sotomayor, who has been a vigorous voice of dissent on the conservative
> majority court, was speaking at an event hosted by the American Bar
> Association.
> 
> In a dissenting opinion on the Texas law case, Sotomayor said her
> colleagues who declined to block the "clearly unconstitutional" law
> "have opted to bury their heads in the sand."
> [...]
> 
> it seems that it is the left who is politicizing the Court.

“I would hope that a wise *Latina woman* with the richness of her
experiences would more often than not reach a *better conclusion* than a
*white male* who hasn’t lived that life,”  -Sonya Sotomayor-



Sounds like that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor is a racial
supremacist....  she believes that one race is better than another and
that one sex is better than another, or that people should do as much
decision making as possible for themselves.  It also suggests that a
White male can't make decisions for a Latina woman but then wouldn't it
hold true using that logic that a Latina woman can't make those
decisions for a White male or a Black person? Because she hasn't lived
their life?

If nothing else the failed logic of her ideal that GOVERNMENT should
make decisions for them all is, a failed system of LOGIC for a Justice
to entertain.

Democrat policies fail, because Democrats presume to know my needs
better than I know them.

Why does Sotomayor presume to know what's best for everyone when she
openly admits that one person who is a White Male is ill equipped to
know what's best for another person who is a Latino FEMALE....


Aren't LATINO MALES against abortion?  How about others who are against
abortion, does she feel she knows what's best for them too? Even though
they don't know what's best for her, being as her race and gender makes
her superior according to Justice Sotomayor?






-- 
That's Karma

*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is we talk about it*
We hate censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you.
Make them prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you
didn't find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you
then you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html



*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*
120 - If identifying and defining gay can't be done, then it must be
like having a soul and spirituality, it's more of a religious
experience. Or it's a delusional mental imbalance.