Re: Bolton Confirms Impeachment Charges
Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Neodome |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/22/2020 1:04 PM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and lied: > On 6/22/20 3:41 PM, Siri Cruise wrote: >> On 6/22/2020 12:39 PM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who >> rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled >> and lied: >> >>> On 6/22/20 3:26 PM, Byker wrote: >>>> On 6/22/2020 9:08 AM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who >>>> rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled >>>> and lied: >>>> >>>>> On 6/22/20 9:07 AM, Bradley H. Sherman wrote: >>>>>> Bolton's a lying asshole that democRATs have always hated >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And if he confirms the Charges he's admitting he was lying and hiding >>>>> evidence >>>> >>>> Bolton was never asked for evidence and never testified, so he neither >>>> lied nor withheld evidence. >>> >>> If he has evidence then he did hide evidence. >> >> No, he did not hide evidence. "Hiding evidence" only can occur if one >> is asked for it and has a legal obligation to provide it. >> > > WHICH means he hid evidence No. As always, your lunacy causes you to blabber a lot of bullshit. He hid no evidence, because he wasn't asked for any. Everything you say is wrong.