Re: Why "all lives matter" is racist and has to stop
KWills <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.survival,alt.politics,alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,or.politics,seattle.politics,talk.politics.guns,alt.california |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sooper Sekrit Gov'mint Agency. Shhhhhhhh. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:00:39 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]> wrote: >On 6/25/20 11:04 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> "All lives matter" is racist. It completely ignores - actually, denies >> - the valid fundamental complaint of the BLM movement. It also is >> racist because the people saying it don't believe it. That is >> *precisely* why there is BLM. >> >> It figures you need my instruction again. "Black lives matter" is >> actually a greatly shortened version of what they're saying. Here's >> what they're saying: "All lives matter, *including* black lives. Stop >> behaving and thinking that black lives don't matter. Black lives >> matter, too. They matter as much as any other lives." >> >> That's what they're saying, and they are right to say so. The cops and >> much of the rest of society - but *especially* the cops - act as if >> black lives don't matter, or that they matter less than other - can you >> say "white"? - lives. That's wrong thinking, and it needs to stop. It >> especially needs to stop from racist white supremacist fat fucks like >> Hartung and Gak and Fredo and Trump. > >The Problem for Democrats is that when you use *all lives matter* it >includes HUMAN LIFE IN THE UTERUS.... > There is no human life in the uterus. You know this. >They have to call it racist but then there are also BLACK LIVES IN THE >UTERUS that DEMOCRATS tell us don't matter. So those all lives can't be >called lives can they? It would show that the DEMOCRATS POLICIES are >contradicting. If in utero, it's not human life. What do you hope to gain from your lying about this? I really do want to know. >SO what DEMOCRATS are saying is that they can't allow equal protection >of the law. Why? You've not offered anything that would support such a claim. >If they do it would mean they are protesting against >ABORTION when they say ALL LIVES MATTER and for it to be construed as >anti ABORTION, would end their movement among DEMOCRATS who support >ABORTION RIGHTS far more than they support BLACKS RIGHTS. Since there is no life until *after* being born, your lying fails. Again. -- KWills Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp counselor. https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/