Re: If Democrats were truly sorry for their past they wouldn't be repeating it >>>Where is the cultural appropriation crowd to call BS on this photo op?

On Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:20:15 -0700, eohoe <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 7/2/2020 1:36 AM, KWills wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 00:10:56 -0700, eohoe<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/30/2020 2:04 AM, KWills wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 01:58:35 -0700, eohoe<[email protected]>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> I've got millions of dollars worth of oil royalties coming my way once
>>>>>>> the pumping begins.  It'll be interesting to watch you have to eat the
>>>>>>> shit sandwich you've been building with your talking out your ass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         You've been making this empty threat for years. It's time to
>>>>>> accept the reality that it's never going to happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You ain't right in the head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         When someone as mentally ill as you prove yourself to be makes
>>>>>> such a claim, it is strong evidence that the opposite is true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "what's the difference between a hooker and a lawyer? A hooker will stop
>>>>>>> screwing you when you're dead"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         I'll bite, how does that apply to the conversation? Aside from
>>>>>> proving you still can't address the TRUTH I posted previously, I don't
>>>>>> see a connection.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvHKsrNqyO4
>>>>
>>>>        You should like this one.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogsbUiSY2TU
>>>
>>> Back in 1991 Tom Selleck sued "The Globe" for $19million for calling him
>>> "gay".
>>
>>       Your point? What does he have to do with our discussion?
>>       Again you try, and fail, to divert from the truth.
>>
>>> Imagine what I'm going to do to you when I get my 1st royalty check from
>>> the oil patch considering that I'm the rightful heir to the throne of
>>> France!  Could make for some headlines in the process.
>>
>>       You will do nothing. And if you are the rightful heir to the
>> throne of France, a position that doesn't exist, where is the
>> evidence?
>>
>>> You're an agitator pure and simple.  Ignoring you would be the simple
>>> thing to do but I've always been a champion of justice.
>>
>>       You're a mentally ill man.
>
>"When someone as mentally ill as you prove yourself to be makes
>such a claim, it is strong evidence that the opposite is true."
>-K Wills
>

     That's why we can be certain I'm not mentally ill. You claim I
am, and you prove you are mentally ill.

>Your posting history is fraught with you calling anyone you target with 
>your BS 'mentally ill.'   Your ad hominem shitshow is ludicrous if it 
>weren't so damn vile.

     You lack honesty.

>
>You ain't right in the head!
>

     See above.

>>> "You're a nasty little prick who is the REAL liar here and you have been
>>> EXPOSED again. I'd advise, Mr. Wills, that this will become an amusing
>>> habit for you. You have now become the TOY for the cats to play with.
>>> ENJOY dipshit!"
>>> -krp, 12/19/07 misc.legal
>>
>>       Again, posting something from a man who lost his mind due to
>> excessive alcohol consumption isn't a great idea. As you will already
>> know, he was so far gone, he beleived there was a conspiracy against
>> him called "MASSIVE COALITION FORCE." (emphasis his)
>
>Do you have some facts to back that up or is that more of your talking 
>out your ass, probably.
>

     I do. Since you've read everything posted by and about me, going
so far as to admitting I'm not Kent, you've seen it. But you so fear
reality, you are actually unable to admit it.

>"I'll go with the FACT that Kent Wills is a pathological LIAR."
>-krp,  1/9/09  misc.legal
>

     Once more, posting something from a man who lost his mind due to
excessive alcohol consumption isn't a great idea. As you will already
know, he was so far gone, he beleived there was a conspiracy against
him called "MASSIVE COALITION FORCE." (emphasis his)
     No amount of your refusal to be honest will ever change this. But
since you fear reality and honesty, you'll continue to use it. You
can't debate on the merits.

>>       But, then, you keep proving you're not a smart man.
>>       Are you going to address the TRUTH I posted earlier, or are you
>> still too scared of reality to do so? Time will tell.
>
>I got yeh for LIBEL and there's no way in hell you're gonna shit post 
>your way out of that.
>

     Odd that you've never been able to cite even one, let alone more,
example of libel from me. In order to try, you had to lie about what I
posted.

>You're obviously an agitator, the next question is: are you some lone 
>nut or an agiprop for someone elses agenda?

     You can lie as much as you feel you need. It doesn't benefit you,
but you aren't able to understand this.

>
>If you're a lone nut I'm gonna sue your sorry ass for libel soon as I 
>get my 1st oil patch check.
>

     You've been making this empty threat for years. Even you can't
hold the delusion it will become a reality. 

>If you're a paid agitator, like in the employ of some George Soros NGO 
>or govt black op contractor then I've got me a HELL of a lawsuit if I 
>can prove such a connection.  We're talking punitive damages in the 100s 
>of millions if it can be proven.
>

     Since the claim is real in your mind only, there will be no such
suit.

>Just keep agitating, asshole.  I'll see you in court, LOSER!
>

     You keep posting this same LIE to divert from the truth I've
posted.

>Kent Wills, 2 time convicted FELON:
>https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

     And he matters because?
     Oh yeah. You are DESPERATE to avoid addressing the TRUTH I posted
earlier. Will you address is now, or continue to prove each item to be
100% true via your attempts to divert? Time will tell.

-- 
KWills
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/