Re: Southern secession was about slavery, not "constitutional principle"
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.survival, alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | idiocracy.gov |
| Message-ID | <EmjNG.70981$%[email protected]> |
On 7/7/20 10:16 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: > https://www.thegreatcoursesdaily.com/was-southern-secession-a-political-revolution/ > Yes it was the Democrats first failed REVOLUTION to create a DEMOCRAT RUN NATION. And the Rebel Flag isn't used as a symbol of that revolution but as a symbol of non-conformity. A symbol like the RAINBOW FLAG, it's of being different. And the Different rainbow flag followers are mentally ill heterosexuals that call themselves gays. Or Racists that call themselves a color rather than an American. A rebel flag is a symbol of defiance against those who intent to force people to all march to the same drummer. Ironically it became the symbol of FREEDOM to do your own thing, which is the opposite of what Democrats want you to do, Democrats want you to be forced to become Marxist ROBOTS the same as the Chinese are forcing the Uiguers to become good little Marxists. -- *That's Karma* *Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*