Re: C19 "Herd Immunity" May Be A Myth

On 7/9/20 10:49 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> BeamMeUpScotty  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 7/9/20 7:17 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>> Kremlin Girl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:47:19 +0000 (UTC), [email protected] (Bradley K.
>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kremlin Girl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  | 
>>>>>>>>>  | It is not a "safe bet" to rely on immunity to Covid-19 as a
>>>>>>>>>  | strategy for coping with the pandemic, one expert has
>>>>>>>>>  | warned, adding that herd immunity strategies were "probably
>>>>>>>>>  | never going to work."
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Given how prevalent the virus has been in NY and NJ, if you can get
>>>>>> the virus twice we'd have data showing that by now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong, wrong, wrong.  There are *lots* of cases of people being
>>>>> PCR-positive, then PCR-negative, then PCR-postitive again.  There
>>>>> are competing explanations for this: faulty tests, hidden reservoirs
>>>>> in the body, second infection, ...
>>>>>
>>>> All you have to do is cite that people frequently get the virus twice.
>>>> I'll wait.
>>>
>>> Wait no longer, Russian troll:
>>>  |
>>>  | Positive RT-PCR Test Results in Patients Recovered From COVID-19
>>>  | ...
>>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762452>
>>>
>> Could you help with theses words...
>>
>> "February 27, 2020"
>> "One hospitalized patient"
>> "at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, "
> 
> Sure.  Here's an explanation of that early result:
>  | 
>  | Four medical professionals with COVID-19 who met the
>  | criteria for hospital release or lifting of quarantine in
>  | China had positive real-time reverse
>  | transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results 5
>  | to 13 days later, according to a research letter published
>  | yesterday in JAMA.
>  | ...
> <https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/02/some-covid-19-patients-test-positive-days-after-recovery>
> 
>     --bks
> 
This explains that there is NOTHING we can trust from China and it was
before they had any real understanding of the virus and there were 4
patients and only one had the virus stay in their system for longer than
the doctors expected.  But then Ebola was found in people who had tested
to be clear of the Ebola for 2 years...   They didn't catch it again...
they were just never cured.  Their immune system didn't have what it
took to cure them.  Like AIDS or HERPES they can suppress virus' but
some virus can stay in the organs or cells, of the patients for years or
for life in the case of AIDS and HERPES and they can get the AIDS virus
count so low that it's unlikely to spread to another person but they
can't cure the person of all the virus in all the cells of the body.

It's looking like the the Corona Virus is acting a bit like the AIDS or
Ebola or Herpes virus.... which was what I suggested months ago, that
someone with AIDS or a similar virus might get the CORONA VIRUS and it
then evolve or mutate and keep some characteristics of AIDS or Herpes...
 I suppose it could happen with Ebola but it's less likely.

And it may be that it was done in a LAB in WUHAN so the combining of
Ebola or AIDS or even herpes or some other similar dormant type virus
and WUHAN-Corona virus and could be a result of splicing and it could
stay in the human body hidden in some people like AIDS and EBOLA and
Herpes are capable of doing, where they're suppressed but never fully
defeated in some people...




-- 
*That's Karma*

*Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*