Re: NYC Begins Painting Black Lives Matter Mural In Front Of Trump Tower

On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:34:18 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
<@😎.🌼🌻🌹🌷🌺🌸> wrote:

>KWills wrote on 2020-07-10 5:06 AM:
>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:35:42 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
>> <@😎.🌼🌻🌹🌷🌺🌸> wrote:
>>
>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote on 2020-07-09 5:15 PM:
>>>> On 7/9/20 4:28 PM, Mighty Wannabe wrote:
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote on 2020-07-09 4:05 PM:
>>>>>> For instance why can't the people across from TRUMP tower Paint their
>>>>>> building face with a message about abortion?   Seems like it's just as
>>>>>> legal?
>>>>>>
>>>>> The court decides abortion rights, not babbling idiots like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> The BLM mural on the road was painted by the city. It is illegal to
>>>>> paint over it just because you don't like it.
>>>> State and Federal laws may prohibit anyone from paining confusing
>>>> markers on the ROADS so the CITY may have violated State and Federal
>>>> laws and could lose funding for road maintenance.
>>> Non of the business of the Federal government.
>>>
>>> The State government approves it.
>>>
>>      Since it was the city that painted it, we can be certain
>> everything required to ensure it was/is legal was done.
>>
>>>> And Painting a MESSAGE in front of PLANNED PARENTHOOD is no more
>>>> offensive than it is to paint one in FRONT of a different BUSINESS
>>>> (TRUMP TOWER) that doesn't kill any BLACK LIVES.
>>> It is hate speech
>>       No it's not.
>>
>>> and obstruction of women's right to choose.
>>>
>>       A painting on the road will not obstruct a woman's choice.
>
>I was referring to "Painting a MESSAGE in front of PLANNED PARENTHOOD". 
>Please pay attention.

     My comment remains valid. It isn't hate speech and won't obstruct
a woman's choice.

>>>> If you don't like the idea of PAINTING...
>>>>
>>>> *BLACK LIVES MATTER EXCEPT INSIDE PLANNED PARENTHOOD*
>>>>
>>>> Then tell planned parenthood to quit killing black lives... that they
>>>> think, don't matter.
>>>>
>>>> And *USING TAX DOLLARS for a POLITICAL MESSAGE* during an election cycle
>>>> is a VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS.
>>>>
>>>> That is FRAUD and embezzling of tax money which is a FEDERAL CRIME, even
>>>> when they are State or city taxes being embezzled for an election.
>>>>
>>>> *TRUMP should sue DeBlasio personally* for his crimes that are leading
>>>> to damage to his property values.
>>> Trump should have liquidated his private business holding before he took
>>> office.
>>       Why?
>
>Conflict of interest.
>
>Trump has been enriching himself by using his hotels, resorts, and golf 
>courses as venues for official events. That is corruption and 
>embezzlement all rolled into one.
>

     100% legal. Unethical, but legal.
     The facility is paid, not Trump. Trump then takes a draw from the
facility.
     You should lobby to have such made illegal. 

>>> His business holdings are now all illegal and subject to
>>> confiscation.
>>       How?
>
>Pay attention !!!
>

     I have and am. I wouldn't be able to prove you wrong if I
weren't. You are trying to claim something that is legal isn't. 

>>> China has tons of money to take over all of Trump's
>>> confiscated holdings.
>>       What confiscated holdings?
>
>See above !!!

     Where you dishonestly claim a legal act isn't legal? That fails
to answer the question I asked.
     Please answer now. And honestly, if you are able.

-- 
KWills
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/