Re: NYC Begins Painting Black Lives Matter Mural In Front Of Trump Tower
KWills <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.survival,alt.politics,alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns,talk.politics.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sooper Sekrit Gov'mint Agency. Shhhhhhhh. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:53:29 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]> wrote: [...] >>>>>> A public property is not Trump's business. The road is not in federal >>>>>> jurisdiction. >>>>> >>>>> The Business relies on the quality of life on that street an when >>>>> DeBlasio degrades with illegal acts >>>> >>>> Painting "Black Lives Matter" on the street in front of Trump's tawdry >>>> building is not illegal. >>>> >>> To start with it's defacing PUBLIC PROPERTY and >> >> This is where #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty goes completely off the cliff. He >> stakes out an absurd position at the outset, then gets more and more >> absurd until he's just babbling and drooling. >> >> It's the city's property. They can paint on it whatever the city >> government decides. > >NO they can't, it's PUBLIC PROPERTY NOT DeBlasio's. Are you claiming De Blasio paid for the painting? >DeBlasio is a >political elected candidate and under the rules of the FEC Federal >Election Commission he can't use the PUBLIC's property for his own gain. > This means DeBlasio has committed FRAUD. There is no evidence of fraud present. But you will present the valid, credible evidence that fraud has been committed. Unless your claim has no basis in reality. > >He was giddy at the opportunity to go out and use PUBLICA PROPERTY and >PUBLIC FUNDS for his own political gains. Where is your evidence of this? I'll examine the evidence you present. And you will present actual evidence, if your claim is true. >so giddy he didn't sceck with >the lawyers to see if it was legal. How do you know this? It's more likely than not that all legal documents, fees, etc. were/are in order. Fortunately you will present the evidence for your claim, if it's true. >And being the Corrupt >Marxist-Democrat that he is he ignore d that all that stuff isn't his >personal property and neither are the police he used and his security >team that he used to go out and engage in this display of self interest >and self political promotion. You have yet to offer any evidence of self interest or self political promotion. -- KWills Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp counselor. https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/