Re: NYC Begins Painting Black Lives Matter Mural In Front Of Trump Tower

KWills wrote on 2020-07-11 9:32 AM:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:34:18 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
> <@😎.🌼🌻🌹🌷🌺🌸> wrote:
>
>> KWills wrote on 2020-07-10 5:06 AM:
>>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:35:42 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
>>> <@😎.🌼🌻🌹🌷🌺🌸> wrote:
>>>
>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote on 2020-07-09 5:15 PM:
>>>>> On 7/9/20 4:28 PM, Mighty Wannabe wrote:
>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote on 2020-07-09 4:05 PM:
>>>>>>> For instance why can't the people across from TRUMP tower Paint their
>>>>>>> building face with a message about abortion?   Seems like it's just as
>>>>>>> legal?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The court decides abortion rights, not babbling idiots like you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The BLM mural on the road was painted by the city. It is illegal to
>>>>>> paint over it just because you don't like it.
>>>>> State and Federal laws may prohibit anyone from paining confusing
>>>>> markers on the ROADS so the CITY may have violated State and Federal
>>>>> laws and could lose funding for road maintenance.
>>>> Non of the business of the Federal government.
>>>>
>>>> The State government approves it.
>>>>
>>>       Since it was the city that painted it, we can be certain
>>> everything required to ensure it was/is legal was done.
>>>
>>>>> And Painting a MESSAGE in front of PLANNED PARENTHOOD is no more
>>>>> offensive than it is to paint one in FRONT of a different BUSINESS
>>>>> (TRUMP TOWER) that doesn't kill any BLACK LIVES.
>>>> It is hate speech
>>>        No it's not.
>>>
>>>> and obstruction of women's right to choose.
>>>>
>>>        A painting on the road will not obstruct a woman's choice.
>> I was referring to "Painting a MESSAGE in front of PLANNED PARENTHOOD".
>> Please pay attention.
>       My comment remains valid. It isn't hate speech and won't obstruct
> a woman's choice.
>
>>>>> If you don't like the idea of PAINTING...
>>>>>
>>>>> *BLACK LIVES MATTER EXCEPT INSIDE PLANNED PARENTHOOD*
>>>>>
>>>>> Then tell planned parenthood to quit killing black lives... that they
>>>>> think, don't matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> And *USING TAX DOLLARS for a POLITICAL MESSAGE* during an election cycle
>>>>> is a VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is FRAUD and embezzling of tax money which is a FEDERAL CRIME, even
>>>>> when they are State or city taxes being embezzled for an election.
>>>>>
>>>>> *TRUMP should sue DeBlasio personally* for his crimes that are leading
>>>>> to damage to his property values.
>>>> Trump should have liquidated his private business holding before he took
>>>> office.
>>>        Why?
>> Conflict of interest.
>>
>> Trump has been enriching himself by using his hotels, resorts, and golf
>> courses as venues for official events. That is corruption and
>> embezzlement all rolled into one.
>>
>       100% legal. Unethical, but legal.
>       The facility is paid, not Trump. Trump then takes a draw from the
> facility.
>       You should lobby to have such made illegal.
>
>>>> His business holdings are now all illegal and subject to
>>>> confiscation.
>>>        How?
>> Pay attention !!!
>>
>       I have and am. I wouldn't be able to prove you wrong if I
> weren't. You are trying to claim something that is legal isn't.
>
>>>> China has tons of money to take over all of Trump's
>>>> confiscated holdings.
>>>        What confiscated holdings?
>> See above !!!
>       Where you dishonestly claim a legal act isn't legal? That fails
> to answer the question I asked.
>       Please answer now. And honestly, if you are able.
>

*Profiting off the Presidency: Trump’s Violations of the Emoluments Clauses*
https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/profiting-off-the-presidency-trumps-violations-of-the-emoluments-clauses/

*Appeals court rejects Trump effort to throw out emoluments case*
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/497721-appeals-court-rules-against-trump-on-emoluments-clause