Calling slavery a tax or Socialism is a *LIE* because what that is, is Slavery masked as something noble... and SLAVERY IS NEVER NOBLE.>>>Journalist Bari Weiss skewers New York Times in her resignation letter
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.news-media,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.radical-left,sac.politics,alt.journalism.newspapers,alt.politics.socialism.democratic,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism |
|---|---|
| Organization | idiocracy.gov |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/14/20 8:00 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote: > https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2020-07-14/bari-weiss- > new-york-times-resignation > > Opinion editor and writer Bari Weiss has left the New York Times, > publishing a scathing resignation letter on her way out Tuesday that > accused the newspaper of allowing “unlawful discrimination, hostile work > environment, and constructive discharge,” among other misdeeds. > > The controversial journalist’s exit comes amid a reckoning prompted by the > Black Lives Matter movement and after the New York Times’ publication of > the inflammatory “Send in the Troops” op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), > which called for military mobilization against protesters. > > The June piece was widely condemned within and beyond the newspaper and > among scores of readers. It sparked what Weiss called a war between > "(mostly young) wokes” and "(mostly 40+) liberals” and ultimately led to > the departure of Opinion editor James Bennet. > > Weiss, who said she experienced “constant bullying by colleagues” who > disagree with her views, was also among the signatories of last week’s > divisive Harper’s open letter on cancel culture. She said she experienced > bullying online and lamented the New York Times’ inaction on her > harassment allegations. > > “Some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be a > truly ‘inclusive’ one, while others post ax emojis next to my name. Still > other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on > Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate > action. They never are,” she wrote in her resignation letter addressed to > Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger. > > “Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has > become its ultimate editor,” she continued. “As the ethics and mores of > that platform have become those of the paper, the paper itself has > increasingly become a kind of performance space. Stories are chosen and > told in a way to satisfy the narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow > a curious public to read about the world and then draw their own > conclusions. I was always taught that journalists were charged with > writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more > ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative.” > > Weiss was not immediately available for additional comment on Tuesday. > > In a Tuesday statement, Kathleen Kingsbury, the New York Times’ acting > editorial page editor, said that she appreciated Weiss’ contributions to > the section and is “personally committed to ensuring that The Times > continues to publish voices, experiences and viewpoints from across the > political spectrum in the Opinion report.” And yet they don't.... they avoud any actual opposition to their own viewpoint. They post garbage of all kinds but no actual condemnations of their own very flawed ideology. When one slips by then they fire the parties involved and move to keep it from happening again, because NOTHING is worse than the TRUTH about LIBERALISM. > > “We see every day how impactful and important that approach is, especially > through the outsized influence The Times’s opinion journalism has on the > national conversation,” Kingsbury said. why read it when we already know the opinions that will be in their print. it's teh same as TWITTER and the Marxist-Democrats views and nothing else worth the time effort or expense of reading it. > New York Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy declined to comment on the > specifics of Weiss’ letter, but added: “We’re committed to fostering an > environment of honest, searching and empathetic dialogue between > colleagues, one where mutual respect is required of all.” > If that means they print HATE and Marxist propaganda then sure, that's what they do. > The civil war inside The New York Times between the (mostly young) wokes > the (mostly 40+) liberals is the same one raging inside other publications > and companies across the country. The dynamic is always the same. > (Thread.) Rinse and repeate.... that is what I say about the Democrats they have patterns and you can go back in time ans see them and that is EXACTLY WHY the Democrats want to erase History. Who seceded from the UNION...? Democrats Who fought against the NORTH...? Democrats Who created the KKK...? Democrats Who creates the Jim Crow *LAWS* ....? Democrats Who filibustered the Civil Rights Act...? Democrats Who bused blacks across town and destroyed their educations... Democrats Who put abortion clinics next to black communities...? Democrats Who used Affirmative Action to convince blacks they are inferior... *One man's Affirmative Action law is another man's Jim Crow law* Who wants to enslave black Americans into the FRACTIONAL SLAVERY of Marxism...? The Democrats and the Marxists at #BLM and the DNC. What is Fractional slavery? it's similar to buying FRACTIONAL OWNERSHIP in a fleet od jets for you to fly on.. the Fractional Slavery is a group of fractional slaves who are owned by a group of Fractional Owners. No one person owns one other person, it's all done in a fractional distribution so that the owners are NOT held out as slave owners when in fact they are, as in ObamaCare where some people paid and some people received what they didn't work for. Slavery is when the person working for the gain or benefits doesn't get the fruits of their own labor, instead another person (the owner) gets the work of the slave for themselves. Which is what ObamaCare was doing by dividing up two groups of people into the slaves and the slave owners and then making them through the Government tax law, FRACTIONAL OWNERS AND FRACTIONAL SLAVES. But it's the same in the end, the people doing the work didn't get the fruits of their labor the other group was receiving the fruits of labor that they never engaged in. Calling slavery a tax or Socialism is a *LIE* because what that is, is Slavery masked as something more noble... and SLAVERY IS NEVER NOBLE. The NYT supports HATE and SLAVERY and MARXISM... -- *That's Karma* *Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*