Re: Insane Gun Nut Missouri Couple Charged for Threatening Peaceful Protesters

On 7/20/20 10:50 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 7/20/2020 7:43 PM, Eric Schild - hysterical histrionical
> estrogen-oozing  squat-to-piss fairy - squealed:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:44:04 -0700 (PDT),  [email protected] says...
>>
>>> "It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those
>>> participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this
>>> situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is
>>> unacceptable in St. Louis," Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner said in
>>> a statement.
>>>
>>> https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/20/us/st-louis-couple-weapons-protesters-charges/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You're a fucking idiot.
> 
> He's not.  You and the McCloskeys (or "McCloskey's," as that illiterate
> klansman Hartung keeps writing) are the idiots.
> 
> The protesters did *NOT* threaten the McCloskeys in any way.  The
> McCloskeys advanced *toward* the peaceful protesters,

They remained on their own property.

The Terrorist Rioters were in a PUBLIC SPACE making threats.


> brandishing
> firearms at them.  *THAT*, Schild, you no-fight squat-to-piss
> estrogen-drenched shrieking fairy, is assault.  The couple *will* be and
> *should* be prosecuted.

The McCloskey family should have stayed inside with their guns, because
going outside is a tactical disadvantage without cover and without a
limited access point they could be over run by a mob since that AR-15 is
single shot and not AUTO-FIRE. Since we don't have full auto weapons it
makes more sense to stay inside a structure to shoot the as the
terrorists come through the door or windows a few at a time, you need to
create a choke point and kill the terrorists one by one until the pile
of bodies is too deep for them to climb over.

Protesters were threatening the couple and that's NOT protesting that's
violating the law which makes it rioting.  When the mob breaks the law
they are rioting.

And threatening people can be construed as terrorism so protecting your
home and family and yourself against terrorists is 100% legal and even
promoted by the Government and the Constitution.  This could be the
point when #BLM is labeled TERRORISTS and it will be because they pushed
the designation by having one of their own RADICALIZED Terrorists in the
government job as the city prosecutor.

The Governmnet told us that when being threatened by terrorists we
should NOT allow them to take control of an airplane or a train where
they intend to kill people.  We are supposed to fight against the
terrorists because we have to stop terrorists.

And since #BLM is regarded as terrorists by Americans and they are
Democrats who have been RADICALIZED BY MARXISTS and/or possibly
Muslims...  we have to protect ourselves.

The Mob will have to be more respectful if we stand up and fight like
the GOVERNMENT told us to do when RADICALIZED TERRORISTS threaten
peaceful citizens.  Those that FIGHT BACK against the TERRORISTS deserve
to be honored like the people in the past who fought against the
terrorists when the terrorists were threatening to assault and/or kill
them.








-- 
*That's Karma*

*Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*