Re: "Trump signs order barring illegal immigrants from census count"

On 7/21/20 9:56 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Josh Rosenbluth <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]: 
> 
>> On 7/21/2020 5:11 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jul/21/donald-trump-signs-or
>>> der-barring-illegal-immigrant/ 
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> President Trump signed an executive action on Tuesday to prevent
>>> illegal immigrants from being included in the 2020 census for
>>> congressional apportionment, saying the U.S. shouldn’t give
>>> political power “to people who should not be here at all.”
>>>
>>> The president said for the purposes of determining the number of
>>> House lawmakers from each state, it will be U.S. policy “to exclude
>>> from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful
>>> immigration status.” 
>>>
>>> He signed the order in the Oval Office without a ceremony or the
>>> media present.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Sounds reasonable.
>>
>> Sounds like it conflicts with the plain text of the Fourteenth
>> Amendment: 
>>
>> "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States
>> according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of
>> persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed."
>>
> 
> 
>     Hartung thinks that fetuses are 
> people but that undocumented workers
> are not. Odd, that. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Neither the fetus' or the illegals are taxed by income tax.  That makes
one or the other illegal, either the FEDERAL AND STATE income tax is
illegal or counting the "illegal aliens" on the census is illegal.

Neither needs a congressman for taxes they can not pay into legally.

But if you count one then you must count the other so Democrats will be
fighting to prove that a human life inside the uterus has inalienable
RIGHTS. The same as a human life outside the UTERUS because neither are
legal residents, and neither pay Income taxes.  Will the individual
States and the United States be willing to end the income tax and
declare the 16th Amendment unconstitutional or will they decide to
declare illegal aliens to be part of the census....  This question isn't
just about the census it's about TAXES and HUMAN LIFE inside the uterus
that doesn't pay tax and isn't called a legal resident until they become
a citizen at birth.


The paradox of DEMOCRATS wanting to kill (abort) a human life that has
Congressional representation would be some real pretzel bending logic to
then say that abortion is Constitutional. Would your Congressional
representative want you to kill one of their voters.  And kill enough
and the State population goes down and a congressional seat might be
lost in that State due to a lower population.

I can't wait to see the Democrats lawsuit against TRUMPS Executive Order.

How will the DEMOCRATS include those human lives called illegal aliens
in a census and exclude the human lives gestating and waiting to become
citizens inside the illegal aliens while including the mother who is
here illegally?  Wouldn't they both be in the census the mother and the
human life in the uterus if we are counting human lives here, rather
than human lives who are legally here.

The census is about *legal representation* so if they're NOT here
legally, how would they legally be counted in the censes so they can
legaly have congressional representation that legally makes tax laws for
tax laws they don't legally pay taxes to.

The LOGIC is going to test.


-- 
*That's Karma*

*Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*