Re: Police seize rifle of St. Louis couple filmed waving guns at BLM protesters
Gunner Asch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.survival,alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,or.politics,seattle.politics,alt.california |
|---|---|
| Organization | Coyote Engineering |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:53:47 -0400, Mighty Wannabe <@ðÂÂÂ.ð¼ð»ð¹ð·ðºð¸> wrote: >> with the correct papers. Because they really are legal according to the >> 2nd amendment. > >No modern firearms. The legal ones are black powder muzzleloader >flintlock muskets in the 2nd Amendment era. Then the 1st Amendment only covers vocal speech, hide megaphones and broadsides printed on movable type Gutenberg type presses? NO 1st amendment protections for data transmitted through electronic media, telephones, radio, Internet. Is that your claim? Interesting..... Gunner __ "Journalists are extremely rare and shouldnÂt be harmed, but propagandists are everywhere and should be hunted for sport" Yeah..with no bag limit. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus