Re: Will Ginsburg ever die

On 7/29/20 11:46 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/29/20 8:17 PM, Democrats Hate America wrote:
>> Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes “Non-Surgical Procedure” to Replace Bile
>> Duct Stent – During Her Chemotherapy
> 
> Ruth Bader Ginsberg will die when it is her time, and not before. For
> anyone to wish otherwise is simply wrong.
> 
Ginsberg believes it's OK to wish for a human life in a uterus to die...
and she goes as far as allowing you to kill that human life you wish
would die.

If you're logical then the same people who support Ginsberg's views are
wishing human lives to be dead and making it happen a million times a
year... why would it be evil for others to wish that same thing of her?
 Not that they actually want her dead they may just want her off the
court. so society can get someone who is healthy and can do the job
efficiently and with a clear mind.  Having the clerks do the job isn't
the same as the Justice herself being able to do the work.

I wonder if she thinks that the human life in a uterus is devoid of the
same instincts that she has to stay alive as it struggles to gestate and
is then violently attacked by a Liberal Doctor that she says has a RIGHT
to deliberately kill a human life inside a uterus because the Liberal
Doctor went to a medical school to become a killer? Where does the
belief that human life is disposable?  I can certainly point out that
the Marxists have that same view.

If Ginsberg were true to her beliefs she'd have never had any medical
procedures and she would have opted for a Liberal Doctor assisted
suicide so that she wouldn't be a burden on the rest of society just as
she says that a human life in the uterus can be killed by a Liberal
Doctor to help the mother and society avoid the human life in the uterus
being a burden to a person or society.

Ginsberg should be thinking of those she might be impacting negatively,
just as she thinks of the human life in the uterus (who just wants to
live) but others decide it's more trouble than it's worth and Ginsberg
should be willing to be put to the same test of whether her hanging on
and using up medical supplies and costing tax payers is really worth the
continuance of her human life.  If she agreed to an anonymous and random
person deciding on her human life then she would at least be true to her
conviction, but we see that she is hanging on to her human life with
both hands while at the same time killing millions of others that are
just as programmed in their DNA by nature to want to live.



-- 
*That's Karma*

*Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*