Re: Judge Orders Mail Fraud Evidence - Uh-Oh, Democrats in Trouble Now

On 8/19/20 12:19 AM, Gronk wrote:
> NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 13:09:39 -0700 (PDT), "[email protected]"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> A federal judge in Pennsylvania told the Trump campaign and the
>>> Republican Party that they must produce evidence they have of
>>> vote-by-mail fraud in the state by Friday.
>>>
>>> The judge's order, in a high-profile case about vote-by-mail in the
>>> battleground state, essentially forces the Trump campaign to try to
>>> back up President Donald Trump's false claims about massive voter
>>> fraud in postal voting.
>>>
>>> "The Court finds that instances of voter fraud are relevant to the
>>> claims and defenses in this case," District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan
>>> wrote on Thursday, telling Republicans that they need to provide
>>> evidence of fraud to the Democratic Party and the Sierra Club, which
>>> are part of the lawsuit.
>>>
>>> The Democrats had asked for information and documents that would show
>>> steps the Republicans took to study the possibility of fraud,
>>> especially related to the use of dropboxes, ballot collection and
>>> mailed-in ballots in the primary elections.
>>>
>>> The Trump campaign and Republicans had refused to do so. But with
>>> Thursday's court order, they must answer questions from the
>>> Democratic groups and turn over records of communications -- or say
>>> they have none. The Trump campaign has until Friday to respond, the
>>> judge said.
>>>
>>> https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/13/politics/trump-campaign-voter-fraud-lawsuit-pennsylvania/index.html
>>>
>>
>> There is no chain of custody with mail in ballotting.  That alone
>> makes it an unreliable method of voting.
>>
> 
> So is no paper trail from electronic voting machines.
> 
> Now, what does that chain of custody thing have to do with the judge's
> orders?

Actually they can go back and verify the count by recounting the paper
ballots because when I vote on a machine.... I feed the paper into the
machine so the machine counts it but it's still on a paper that is
sealed in a container.  I haven't worked in a precinct in a lot of years
but I'd say the security can be just as strong as in the past by using
voting machines the correct way, to speed up counting and keep the chain
of custody in the hands of the voter until it's counted the first time
and it can enhance security NOT by replacing the paper system with 100%
electronic voting or mail in voting..

By having a paper trail the Marxist criminals trying to steal the
election have to then coordinate two thefts, one the electronic and the
other the paper ballots.  and they have to be able to do it with exact
timing and numbers.  Otherwise the falsifying of information becomes
obvious. And if that happens they need to own and weaponize the FBI and
STATE Bureau of investigation heads like Obama owned the FBI and teh CIA
and DOJ and the Department of State...  Why did Obama and Democrats
need to weaponize all those departments if they weren't using that power
to cheat in elections?

The mere fact that the Obama and Marxist-Democrats did weaponize the
governmnet against the American people is damning.





-- 
*That's Karma*

*Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*
https://banned.video/watch?id=5f37fcc2df77c4044ee2eb03