Re: Email to Justice Anita Earls
Jimmy knows crooked Sammie Ervin IV <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.appalachian |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 1:43:35 PM UTC-5, Jimmy knows crooked Sammie Ervin IV wrote: > For your dissent in the case against corrupt Asheville judge, Eddie Clontz, you are a disgrace and an embarrassment to the judiciary. Clontz issued a show-cause order in a 50C RO case where it was obvious, had he not been too lazy to look, that the defendant/respondent could not possibly have been in contempt, had just been served and was unaware of the RO and no time had elapsed in which the defendant could have violated it. >>Your Honor, why don't you take a look at the two Clontz-corrupted Martha Tackitt-Grist cases (Grist v. Smith)? In the first case Clontz gave her a TRO even though she had not requested it and without making proper findings. Then about the same time as the defendant was being served with the summons, TRO, and complaint, she ran to the courthouse and had Judge Clontz sign a show-cause order on her affidavit perjuring herself that he had violated the TRO. These shocking court orders, backed with fines and imprisonment, are a great way to assassinate someone, and destroy his character, without killing him. >>Then Martha Grist brought another NCGS 50C action against the defendant after her previous RO had expired and she had perjured herself repeatedly without success to get him thrown in jail and fined for contempt. This woman who claimed to be a schoolteacher had even had the police on him (in reality ME) --with guns drawn-- after RO #1 was expired. After they learned they'd been had, their report was closed as "UNFOUNDED." She had dialed 911 and claimed I violated RO #1. Using most of the District Court judges -- ESPECIALLY CLONTZ -- in Buncombe, Martha Grist had incited another riot and was rehearsing for more. >>This time when she tried to have me jailed, I filed interrogatories and requests for admissions. Clontz struck those as null and void because he said in open court I had harassed her by mailing the discovery to her instead of her lawyer. It reminded me of her squalling to a judge every time I filed a motion before the Court of Appeals in the first RO case and was required to send her a copy of the motion. THAT, she claimed, was harassment. >>And, btw, that RO had been obtained by stealth and fraud. The courthouse had been closed in February due to a heavy snow on the date set for the hearing. I called and asked when it was reset to. The clerk gave me a date. But in the meantime it was heard without notice to me BEFORE the date given me by the clerk. I should have appealed the harsh judgment, but I had just spent exhausting hours of frustration and disappointment contesting the first RO in the appellate courts. And I was getting old, in my seventies, asthmatic, and sickly. You just gave that scoundrel CLONTZ a green light to continue to smear the judiciary with his corruption. The guy is a holy terror and married to a convicted felon who embezzled over $100k at a local law firm. In another case he struck the defendant's interrogatories and requests for admissions because the defendant mailed them to the plaintiff. Clontz *falsely* claimed the pro se defendant knew to serve them on the plaintiff's attorney. And you should have been in courtroom 3A yesterday in Buncombe when this raving scoundrel in a black dress went crazy with evil, flew into a rage, and capriciously dismissed an appeal and request for a jury trial for a severely crippled old woman at home in bed because she was unable to attend court and her doctor had sent a letter verifying it. I can't begin to tell you what evils men do because of groveling aiders and abbettors like you. You're a disgrace. Have you no shame? Clontz's despicable behavior in Roger Smith's case wherein Clontz heard a preliminary hearing without the defendant's attorney (Smith), and while the defendant was chained up without paper and pencil, is rather insignificant compared to his future and continuing violations of the canons of ethics. Why don't you write a panegyric for the skank and kiss him in the mouth? Well, you already did. You already have. You smooched the scoundrel all over his face. >>Let me say this about your demand for a secret letter to Clontz tapping him on his sallow wrist: It is not enough that justice is done. Justice must be SEEN to be done!