Re: YouTube Shadow-Banned This Material

Its a World of Larrys <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.appalachian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, April 11, 2023 at 12:35:34 PM UTC-7, Jimmy knows crooked Sammie Ervin IV wrote:
> 2 days ago 
> D. was convicted by Judge Sam Cathey in Asheville for cyberstalking. He was sentenced to 30 days, *suspended* for one year with a few minor conditions of suspension including unsupervised probation and payment of about $1K in costs. D. was having none of this BS. 
> 
> D. had studied the caselaw and the statute, and Prof. Eugene Volokh's articles about free speech, and knew he had stalked no one and therefore had violated no law and particularly no criminal law. So he immediately appealed in open court to Superior Court and a jury for trial de novo, i. e., a new trial. Now what that appeal meant in settled NC law was that the criminal conviction by Judge Cathey was now a nullity, fully erased under the law, and Judge Cathey no longer had ANY jurisdiction in the matter. Nor was the jury to know anything about it, and D. was presumed innocent as if the District Court trial in front of Cathey had never occurred. 
> 
> But while the case was pending in Superior Court, the criminal file was feloniously forged to show that the D. received active time of 30 days in prison*. After D. had attended Superior Court about 5 exasperating times for calendar call on Monday morning before a judge who scowled and showed her fangs at him every time he came to court, he wrote Ron Moore, the DA, in longhand, and warned him he was going to the US Attorney to complain that his civil rights were violated. Two days later the DA, Ron Moore, sent word to D. thru his attorney that he was dismissing the case. And about 5 days later, he did dismiss the warrant and judgment _with prejudice,_ meaning it could not be resurrected. 
> 
> And, btw, no one has been called to account for these felonies by officials in the Buncombe courthouse. The file has the filth, the spoor, DNA, and fingerprints of several clerks including Steve Cogburn, the DA (now defeated), and the judge all over it. It had been altered with the use of whiteout, also known as liquid paper. If it hadn't been for that tiny unobtrusive digital recorder in the courtroom before Judge Cathey... 
> 
> It is obvious what the conspiring racketeers, including scurrilous Doug Edwards,** thought D. would do after being dragged into Superior Court so many times: he'd throw in the towel and ask the court to let him go back to the district court for compliance with the judgment, but not knowing that he'd be in the immediate jackpot for a month's incarceration. 
> 
> *Sleazy clerk, Steve Cogburn, even dragged up a greasy fat clerk from down in the clerk's office catacombs who stated to the two investigating law-enforcement officers, that she had been the official courtroom clerk in Judge Cathey's courtroom at the nonjury trial in question and that her handwritten minutes disclosed an active sentence of 30 days in prison. D. saw the corrupted minutes and demanded a copy but Cogburn grabbed the minutes and stormed out of the room. At least D. has copies of both the probationary judgment of Cathey and the forged and corrupted judgment. 
> 
> **Sleazebag Doug Edwards ran in the primary against our current DA, Todd Williams. I think Edwards received an embarrassing 2% of the vote. A woman came in second, while Edwards came in third, and Williams came in first, which meant Williams was reelected and Edwards bit the dust and didn't have the courage to ask for his old job back as an assistant district attorney. I'll tell you this about Edwards: he's cocky, stupid, an officious intermeddling windbag...and has the integrity of a German cockroach.

Zowee!  So in other words, are you still planning to speak on friday at the mensa shindig at the famous manfart fast food fiesta?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.