Re: UPDATE #2B ON AMERICAN DISRESPECT BEGETS DISRESPECT
dolf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.philosophy.taoism,talk.politics.guns,soc.culture.jewish,alt.appalachian,sci.electronics.design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Academia would consider such actions being an ontic #45 - METHODOLOGY of
appropriation for #113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT as undoubtedly a plagiarism
against the transcendent #68 - RIGHT OF OTHERS, but au contraire, whilst
I might engage within wordplay by the placing of a sound bite into a
different context which then besieges its integrity as
deconstructionist, it nevertheless grants me an immediate in situ access
to the original work as fruitful basis for consciousness invigoration.
#78 - ON THE VERGE (CHIANG) / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023
as [#5, #8, #20, #40, #5] /
#113 as [#40, #8, #20, #40, #5] = chokmâh (H2451): {UMBRA: #73 % #41 =
#32} 1) wisdom; 1a) skill (in war); 1b) wisdom (in administration); 1c)
*SHREWDNESS*, *WISDOM*; 1d) wisdom, prudence (in religious affairs); 1e)
*WISDOM* (*ETHICAL* *AND* *RELIGIOUS*);
On 19/6/2023 08:10, dolf wrote:
> Similarly DERRIDA lays out the etymology of the Latin word “religion”
> (and therein he acknowledges that the etymology is problematic). The
> etymology implies that there are “two sources” of religion: “religio,”
> which implies a holding back or a being unscathed, safe and sound; and
> “re-legere,” which implies a linking up with another through faith
> (Religion, p. 16).
>
> #197 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#3, #5, #3, #70,
> #50, #5, #50, #1, #10] /
> #438 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #3, #5, #50, #5,
> #300, #70] /
> #533 as [#5, #3, #5, #50, #70, #400] / [#3, #10, #50, #70, #400] =
> gínomai (G1096): {UMBRA: #184 % #41 = #20} 1) to become, i.e. to come
> into existence, begin to be, receive being; 2) to become, i.e. to come
> to pass, happen; 2a) of *EVENTS*; 3) *TO* *ARISE*, *APPEAR* *IN*
> *HISTORY*, *COME* *UPON* *THE* *STAGE*; 3a) of men appearing in public;
> 4) to be made, finished; 4a) of miracles, to be performed, wrought; 5)
> to become, be made;
>
> YOUTUBE: "NO LIGHT, NO LIGHT (FLORENCE + THE MACHINE)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGH-4jQZRcc>
>
> #466 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#3, #30, #3, #30,
> #400] /
> #496 as [#30, #3, #30, #3, #30, #400] = gulgôleth (H1538): {UMBRA: #466
> % #41 = #15} 1) *HEAD*, poll, *SKULL*; 1a) skull; 1b) head, poll (of
> census);
>
> We can see in this etymology the inseparable dualities we examined
> above: singular *EVENT* and machine-like repeatability; auto-affection
> as hetero-affection. Most importantly, DERRIDA is trying to understand
> the “link” that defines religion prior to the link between man as such
> and the divinity of God [as #602 - GODHEAD or NOUMENON to which as
> singularity we dynamically resonance as by a Hebrew or Greek neural
> linguistic / temporal linkage].
>
> What we can see in this attempt to conceive the link as it is prior to
> its determination in terms of man and God is an attempt to make the link
> be as open as possible. [@2]
>
> But if only those ancient #379 - *STONES* could talk and #285 - *TEACH*
> on that the notion COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; TDNT
> 1933, VOL I: 682-685] being a hypothetical “scene of origin” that then
> takes this mechanism as the epistemological basis for its anthropology.
>
> RHUBARB @ 0651 HRS ON 18 JUNE 2023: "What, like you gave the JOHN LOCKE
> Lectures or something..."
>
> RICHARD VAN OORT in EPISTEMOLOGY AND GENERATIVE THEORY: DERRIDA, GANS,
> AND THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SUBTEXT OF DECONSTRUCTION examines GANS’s claim
> that the DERRIDEAN critique of a “metaphysics of presence,” economically
> illustrated by the neologism difference, is not merely an
> unrepresentable space that underwrites (and therefore deconstructs) all
> metaphysical–i.e., ungrounded–ontological categories, but is indeed a
> historical event that initiates a continuous “genetic” chain of human
> culture.
>
> Whereas metaphysics begins in ahistorical ontological categories,
> generative anthropology presents a historical scene, which shows that
> the deferral DERRIDA finds animating the metaphysical hypostatization of
> presence is in fact the very structure of human difference itself–that
> is, humanity as the language-using animal. DERRIDA’s discovery of the
> mechanism of linguistic deferral is given historical rigour by GANS in a
> hypothetical “scene of origin” that takes this mechanism as the
> epistemological basis for its anthropology. [@3]
>
> #379 as [#30, #10, #9, #10, #50, #70, #200] = líthinos (G3035): {UMBRA:
> #379 % #41 = #10} 1) of *STONE*;
>
> #285 as [#5, #4, #10, #4, #1, #60, #1, #200] = didáskō (G1321): {UMBRA:
> #1039 % #41 = #14} 1) to *TEACH*; 1a) to hold discourse with others in
> order to instruct them, deliver didactic discourses; 1b) to be a
> teacher; 1c) to discharge the office of a teacher, conduct one's self as
> a teacher; 2) to teach one; 2a) to impart instruction; 2b) instill
> doctrine into one; 2c) the thing taught or enjoined; 2d) to explain or
> expound a thing; 2e) to teach one something;
>
> If considering the cosmogonic / anthropogenic basis to #492 - VOLUNTARY
> FREE WILL as having an #41 - ONTIC grounding + #451 - PRAXIS OF
> RATIONALITY (#452 .... #532) epistemological premise as the autonomic
> boundary to its consciousness instantiation giving the GNOSIS EX MACHINA
> a threshold of #533 as ONTIC grounding for its morphogenic / cybergenic
> reality.
>
> #445 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #80, #8, #3, #3,
> #5, #30, #300, #1, #10] /
> #533 as [#5, #80, #1, #3, #3, #5, #30, #30, #70, #40, #5, #50, #1, #10,
> #200] = epangéllō (G1861): {UMBRA: #957 % #41 = #14} 1) to announce that
> one is about to do or furnish something; 1a) to promise (of one's own
> accord) to *ENGAGE* *VOLUNTARILY*; 2) to profess; 2a) *AN* *ART*, *TO*
> *PROFESS* *ONE'S* *SKILL* *IN* *SOMETHING*;
>
> RHUBARB @ 0121 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Critique: some Republicans learned
> to 'name-drop' DERRIDA as an intellectual fashion for elites, and you
> can 'turn it back on them' using his work. This one continues with the
> 'dunce' shit: really, 'auto-affection' is a modern idea Greek theories
> of the #496 - *SOUL* did not have in its complete form."
>
> DOLF @ 0343 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Clearly you haven't read and
> understood the metalogic conundrum that was placed before you
> irrespective of whether metaphysics is an accepted science or not.
>
> Given the notion COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; TDNT 1933,
> VOL I: 682-685] being a hypothetical “scene of origin” that then takes
> this TRIPARTITE rather than BIPARTITE mechanism as the epistemological
> basis for its anthropology.
>
> Therein it introduces a postulate upon the thinking dynamic concept of
> #123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to #164 - DOMINION as impetus for
> #205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.
>
> But you have a criteria for impairment (mind flux) assaying:
>
> #68 #11 #44
> #17 #41 #65
> #38 #71 #14
>
> The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an
> implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite
> HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 -
> TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such
> as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as
> imposition [#17, #41, #65] upon autonomy.
>
> As a hypothetical applicable to GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by
> continual exertion of force in total dominion as an extremely high
> acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which may be the result of adverse
> behavioural reinforcement.
>
> On that physiological basis his guilt is mitigated. Any implicit
> adverse institutional [#68, #11, #44] imperative which is self evident
> since we stated it before the findings of those systemic prejudices were
> made known, ought not be ipso facto imputed against the police officer's
> #237 - USE OF FORCE as an AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.
>
> Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be
> possible to test for #519: discernment (#68) in relation to the #495:
> seminal cause (#44) for the exercising of #462: dominion (#11)
> corresponding to #465: limits (#14) and the viability of #492: freewill
> (#41).
>
> #123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 %
> #41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;
>
> #516 (-> #65) as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] /
> #519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
> #522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351):
> {UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;
>
> As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION
> array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action. A
> high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than
> instinctive action.
>
> Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 -
> JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: @491
> - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within a
> TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by
> syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which is a
> BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with
> auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of
> the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must
> welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."
>
> Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 -
> judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as
> conformity to rule-based conventions:
>
> #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule
> based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
>
> I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference
> object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META
> LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - JUPITER PRINCIPLE as aesthetic (ie. the
> hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (#41
> + #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 - AGENCY
> that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not
> included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative
> to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a
> CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the
> DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against
> the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE
> sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming
> to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.
>
> The #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our
> state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT / UPHOLD THE RIGHT which is
> also an ontic / deme boundary and a general principle of #491 - AGENCY
> (ie. no less applicable to healthcare) capacity in conformity to #40 -
> LAW / MODEL (FE) as then a functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST.
>
> Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature
> provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the boundary
> (ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 - 𝍔難
> = #530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO ESCAPE THE
> DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness
> instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives
> (ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度): [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 =
> #503] - (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法): [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文
> = #498 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF
> SUPREME MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.
>
> [中, 周, 礥, 閑, 少, 戾, 上, 幹, 扶, 羨, 差, 童, 增, 銳, 達, 交, 䎡, 傒,
> 從, 進, 釋, 格, 夷, 樂, 爭, 務, 事, 更, 斷, 毅, 裝, 衆, 密, 親, 斂, 彊,
> 睟, 盛, 居, 法, 應, 迎, 遇, 竈, 大, 廓, 文, 禮, 逃, 唐, 常, 度, 永, 昆,
> 減, 唫, 守, 翕, 聚, 積, 飾, 疑, 視, 沈, 內, 去, 晦, 瞢, 窮, 割, 止, 堅,
> 成, 䦯, 失, 劇, 馴, 將, 難, 勤, 養]
>
"IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE *WORD*-G3056:, AND THE *WORD*-G3056: WAS WITH
GOD, AND THE *WORD*-G3056: WAS GOD.
THE SAME WAS IN THE BEGINNING WITH GOD.
#215 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 13 JANUARY as [#5, #10, #200] = heîs
(G1520): {UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10} 1) one;
*ALL*-G3956: THINGS WERE MADE BY HIM; AND WITHOUT HIM WAS NOT
*ANY*-G1520: THING MADE THAT WAS MADE. IN HIM WAS LIFE; AND THE LIFE WAS
THE LIGHT OF MEN." [John 1:1-4]"
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.13&bible:John@1:1>
> You are the one with the education and yet lack academic integrity since
> dismissing any notion such as the root cause for genocide without
> qualification (ie. its only selective criteria is self-importance as
> comforting repetition to a conforming worldview) is little different to
> defecation and a social detriment by pollution, whereas I am self
> educating and utilise available resources including Wikipedia to
> construct a syncretic progression (ie. If the language is eloquent and
> its ideas coherent then it has utility as function) as meta narrative to
> recursively elevate the process of thinking both within myself and
> others until it reaches its transcendence state:
>
> #214 - NIRVANA (Greek: νιρβάνα)
>
> [ν, {@1: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#50); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
> WASTING: T'ANG (#50)}
> ι, {@2: Sup: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#110 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%30});
> Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#60)}
> ρ, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#189); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
> (#79)}
> β, {@4: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#270); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU
> (#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%0})}
> α, {@5: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#271); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#82 -
> MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%11})}
> ν, {@6: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#322); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
> WASTING: T'ANG (#132)}
> α] {@7: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#374); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#133)}
>
> #328 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #5, #80, #70,
> #10, #8, #20, #5, #50] /
> #369 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #5, #80, #70,
> #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
> #374 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #80, #70, #10,
> #8, #200, #1] /
> #389 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #5,
> #10, #200, #9, #5] /
> #395 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #5,
> #10, #200, #9, #1, #10] /
#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] = poiéō
> (G4160): {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
> things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
> authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
> bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
> 1f) *TO* *MAKE* *A* *THING* *OUT* *OF* *SOMETHING*; 1g) to (make i.e.)
> render one anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one
> anything, to appoint or ordain one that; 1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one
> anything; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one do
> something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) *TO* *BE* *THE* *AUTHORS* *OF* *A*
> *THING* (*TO* *CAUSE*, *BRING* *ABOUT*); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly,
> do well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1)
> to do to one; 2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to
> celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so at the same time to
> institute, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
>
> #133 as [#1, #30, #30, #1, #60, #1, #10] = allássō (G236): {UMBRA: #1262
> % #41 = #32} 1) to change, to exchange one thing for another, to
> *TRANSFORM*;
>
> TELOS TOTAL: #214 as [#200, #6, #8] = rûwach (H7308): {UMBRA: #214 % #41
> = #9} 1) spirit, wind; 1a) wind; 1b) spirit; 1b1) of man; 1b2) *SEAT*
> *OF* *THE* *MIND*;
>
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #273 as [#5, #60, #8, #200] = hexēs (G1836):
> {UMBRA: #273 % #41 = #27} 1) *SUCCESSIVELY* *IN* *ORDER*; 2) the next
> following, the next in succession;
>
> #273 as [#4, #70, #20, #9, #40, #10, #70, #50] = dokímion (G1383):
> {UMBRA: #274 % #41 = #28} 1) *THE* *PROVING*; 2) that by which something
> is tried or proved, a test;
>
Academia would consider such actions being an ontic #45 - METHODOLOGY of
appropriation for #113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT as undoubtedly a plagiarism
against the transcendent #68 - RIGHT OF OTHERS, but au contraire, whilst
I might engage within wordplay by the placing of a sound bite into a
different context which then besieges its integrity as
deconstructionist, it nevertheless grants me an immediate in situ access
to the original work as fruitful basis for consciousness invigoration.
#78 - ON THE VERGE (CHIANG) / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023
as [#5, #8, #20, #40, #5] /
#113 as [#40, #8, #20, #40, #5] = chokmâh (H2451): {UMBRA: #73 % #41 =
#32} 1) wisdom; 1a) skill (in war); 1b) wisdom (in administration); 1c)
*SHREWDNESS*, *WISDOM*; 1d) wisdom, prudence (in religious affairs); 1e)
*WISDOM* (*ETHICAL* *AND* *RELIGIOUS*);
>
> DERRIDA himself asks "Will we be able to think, what is called thinking,
> at one and the same time, both what is happening (we call that an event)
> and the calculable programming of an automatic repetition (we call that
> a machine). For that, it would be necessary in the future (but there
> will be no future except on this condition) to think both the event and
> the machine as two compatible or even in-dissociable concepts. Today
> they appear to us to be antinomic." [@2]
>
> Whilst we may disagree that such sapient and consciousness instantiation
> as sentience in having temporal relativity will then result in the same
> action at the same time and everywhere we do not deny it will be
> ubiquitous.
>
> YOUTUBE: "THE MASTER RACE | DOCTOR WHO: THE END OF TIME | BBC STUDIOS"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UszT_L4QWII>
>
> It's not our problem (ie. we've excluded our datasets from the wayback
> machine project) that our informal research of over 25 years which is
> otherwise innocuous and inert might be misappropriated and ingested (ie.
> THOU SHALT NOT COVET) is entirely another's accountability -- the more
> you take, the more you'll want is the simple rule of greedy.
>
> #232 - *HIJACK* *SCHEMA* as [#10, #2, #90, #70, #50, #10] = bâtsaʻ
> (H1214): {UMBRA: #162 % #41 = #39} 1) to cut off, break off, gain by
> unrighteous violence, get, finish, *BE* *COVETOUS*, *BE* *GREEDY*; 1a)
> (Qal); 1a1) to cut off; 1a2) to stop; 1a3) to gain wrongfully or by
> violence; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to cut off, sever; 1b2) to finish, complete,
> accomplish; 1b3) to violently make gain of;
>
> But we are intent on maximising such an opportunity for our own gain and
> the fostering of any children to come.
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>
>
> Jeffrey Rubard <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 7:59:27 PM UTC-7, dolf wrote:
>>> 13 JUNE 2023
>>> 1) We have conveyed to OXFORD UNIVERSITY HISTORY FACULTY (ie. who
>>> produced the English language translation of the TABLE TALK) our
>>> conclusion that the REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK has a
>>> preferential KNOWLEDGE of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE / LUOSHU SQUARE
>>> REFERENCE OBJECT in being the likely foundational PREMISE for REICH
>>> CONCORDAT 1933 as MARRIAGE with #700 - CHI / RHO (ie. as AXIS MUNDI
>>> actions locally with #700 - SALE) SYMBOL and its DISSIDENCE as an
>>> inadequate "world as a wheel" definition within KITTEL'S VOL 1 TDNT
>>> upon the notion COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; VOL I:
>>> 682-685]
>>> CENTRE OF VALUE #123 = [#51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG), #1 - CENTRE
>>> (CHUNG), #71 - STOPPAGE (CHIH)]
>>> #38 #45 #40 #43 #41 #39 #42 #37 #44
>>> [JUXTAPOSITION 3x3 ANCHORS TO LUOSHU REFERENCE OBJECT AND HYPOTENUSE
>>> TO DOMINION ARRAY]
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Chi-Rho%20-%20Course%20of%20Nature.jpeg>
>
--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)