We've see how blaming the inanimate objects has increased crime rather than lowering crime : Treason Act charge after Windsor Castle crossbow incident

On 8/2/22 2:02 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
> https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-berkshire-62396574
> 
> A man allegedly found with a crossbow in the grounds of Windsor Castle on
> Christmas Day has been charged under the Treason Act.
> 
> Jaswant Singh Chail, 20, has also been charged with threats to kill and
> possession of an offensive weapon.

In the United States Constitution crossbows are called "arms" and there 
is a RIGHT to keep and bear them.  It's NOT illegal to have a crossbow, 
but to be crazy or threaten a person's life... that is something for due 
process to "establish" a legal solution for.   It seems it all comes 
down to the person NOT the arms they possess under their RIGHT to keep 
and bear arms.

> Mr Chail, from Southampton, is in custody and will appear at Westminster
> Magistrates' Court on 17 August.
> 
> The charges were brought after an investigation by the Metropolitan
> Police's Counter Terrorism Command.
> 
> Mr Chail was arrested at about 08:30 GMT on Christmas Day. The Met said he
> was stopped "within moments" of entering the grounds and he did not enter
> any buildings.
> 
> He has been charged with an offence under section 2 of the 1842 Treason
> Act, namely "discharging or aiming firearms, or throwing or using any
> offensive matter or weapon, with intent to injure or alarm her Majesty",
> said Scotland Yard.
> 
> The Queen had been staying at Windsor Castle for Christmas, rather than
> spending it as usual on her Sandringham estate in Norfolk.
> 
> Her Majesty was due to be joined for lunch by the Prince of Wales and the
> Duchess of Cornwall, as well as the Earl and Countess of Wessex.
> 
> Under the 1842 Treason Act, it is an offence to assault the Queen, or have
> a firearm or offensive weapon in her presence with intent to injure or
> alarm her or to cause a breach of peace.
> 
> In 1981, Marcus Sarjeant was jailed for five years under the section of
> the Treason Act after he fired blank shots at the Queen while she was
> riding down The Mall in London during the Trooping the Colour parade.


An obvious mental case that in the United States deserves due process 
and then to be put in a mental facility for the criminally insane. 
While the State/Federal mental facilities were closed it doesn't mean we 
shouldn't lock up the criminals who have been given due process and 
convicted of a crime and are mentally ill, and the mentally ill 
conviction whereby they are found to be mentally ill come with a 
sentence, that is based on their sanity so they may never get out or 
they may be released some day like John Hinckley Jr. who shot Reagan was 
recently released.

But any way you look at it, it's the mental illness of the person NOT 
the arms they keep and bear that are the problem.

The RIGHT TO BE FREE for mentally ill people having been given due 
process needs to be removed NOT the RIGHTS of the FREE PEOPLE who are 
NOT subjected to due process.

This situation proves that AR-15 and crossbows which are no longer even 
weapons of war are also not the reaon for crime but rather like the cars 
and light bulbs present and used in crimes, and are just excuses for the 
persons committing crime, to shift the real responsibility from them.

And we've see how blaming the inanimate objects has increased crime 
rather than lowering crime, because the root problem in crime is the 
criminal NOT the car used or the shoes used or the mask used to committ 
the crime.

-- 
-That's karma-

The result is DEMOCRATS lies about history and reality to themselves and 
others means their attempts to figure-out what's wrong is an exercise in 
futility, because what they think they know they really don't know, and 
fixing problems without the truth... becomes a fools errand.