Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery"
Walter Duerson <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Nov 2021 02:31:38 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.arguments,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]: > On 11/27/2021 1:23 PM, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee Bryant lied: > >> On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some >> news:[email protected]: >> >>> On 7/20/2020 5:12 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>> On 7/20/20 7:07 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 7/20/2020 4:46 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>> On 7/20/20 6:04 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 2:26 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 3:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 1:12 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 2:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 12:54 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No. The 3/5 compromise was *not* anti-slavery. Your >>>>>>>>>>> subject line is a lie. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It gave the slavers something they didn't deserve. It was >>>>>>>>>>> pro-slavery. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Would you rather that the slaves had been counted for >>>>>>>>>> representation >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If they didn't get to vote, they should not have been counted >>>>>>>>> for representation at all. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then most of the people in the northern states should not have >>>>>>>> been counted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They should have been the same as similarly situated people in the >>>>>>> south. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just stop with the bullshit that the 3/5 compromise was >>>>>>> "anti-slavery." It was not. It was pro-slavery. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I said, >>>>> >>>>> You're full of shit. Only really shitty sophistry can try to >>>>> pretend the 3/5 compromise was "anti-slavery." It wasn't - it was >>>>> pro-slavery. It was a sop to the slavers. >>>> >>>> Without that compromise, there would not have been a USA. >>> >>> False. >> >> �In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the >> > > southern white supremacists, who then were Democrats but today are > Republiscums/QAnon. Not true. The racists and homophobes are still Democrats today.