Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery"
Walter Duerson <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Nov 2021 02:47:25 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.arguments,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]: > On 11/28/2021 12:33 PM, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW > Pig-Fucker confessed: > >> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:13:32 -0800, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/28/2021 12:02 PM, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW >>> Pig-Fucker tried to bullshit but failed, because Rudy stopped him: >>> >>>> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 10:11:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/28/2021 10:01 AM, Attila wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 09:42:38 -0800, Rudy Canoza >>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/28/2021 8:38 AM, Attila wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:35:56 -0800, Rudy Canoza >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 11/27/2021 1:17 PM, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee >>>>>>>>> Bryant lied: >>>>>>>>>> On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some >>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 4:46 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 6:04 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 2:26 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 3:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 1:12 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 2:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 12:54 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The 3/5 compromise was *not* anti-slavery. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your subject line is a lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It gave the slavers something they didn't deserve. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was pro-slavery. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather that the slaves had been counted for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they didn't get to vote, they should not have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counted for representation at all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then most of the people in the northern states should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been counted. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They should have been the same as similarly situated >>>>>>>>>>>>> people in the south. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just stop with the bullshit that the 3/5 compromise was >>>>>>>>>>>>> "anti-slavery." It was not. It was pro-slavery. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As I said, on this subject you are stupid. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No. Concession of defeat noted. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The "compromise" was pro-slavery, in that it gave the >>>>>>>>>>> slavers political power they didn't deserve. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The slavers were profiteering slaves and white Democrats! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slaves didn't own slaves. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> True, but a lot of blacks were free men and some of them >>>>>>>> owned slaves. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, you liar, it is false that "a lot of blacks were free men," >>>>>>> and false that very many of them owned slaves. >>>>>> >>>>>> Free blacks in the antebellum period [...] >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african-american-odyssey/free-blacks- >>>>>> in-the-antebellum-period.html >>>>> >>>>> None of that supports your claim — your lie — that there were >>>>> "a lot" of free blacks. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Southern Democrats then were conservatives. Today, >>>>>>>>> all white supremacists are Republiscums/QAnon. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are personally aquatinted [sic] with all white >>>>>>>> supremacists? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "aquatinted"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All white supremacists are on the political far right. They >>>>>>> always have been. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can say that because you know all of them? >>>>> >>>>> I don't need to know all of them. >>>> >>>> So your claim that "all" of them are white supremacists >>> >>> All white supremacists are white supremacists, Jack-Off Skeeter >>> Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker. That's true by definition. >>> All white supremacists are on the far left. >> >> You lose again Rudy. > > Yes, I Jack-Off Pig-Fuckers too. You should see a doctor for that, Rudy.