Re: Denim Blue Eyes

Cujo DeSockpuppet <[email protected]> posted:

> George J. Dance <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]: 
> 
> > Cujo DeSockpuppet <[email protected]> posted:
> > 
> >> Pickles and Liezlotz deserve scorn throughout eternity. One called 
> >> everyone pedophiles, the other was one. KKKluckles' disturbing
> >> fantasies aside, there was just something fundamentally wrong with
> >> him being such a pathological liar and being so bad at it. 
> >  
> > Got it. One called you a pedophile, and you called the other one a
> > pedophile. 
> 
> I have no doubt about KKKlucKKKles, he and Tommy Tosser were absolutely 
> disgusting people and flaunted his sickness too. I'm aware Nadless can 
> only lash out at anyone he can't respond to.
> 
> >> But for my own curiosity, who are the "three stooges" from your 
> >> perspective? From your phrasing, you're leaving the lovely and
> >> talented NancyGene out of that set, so it also seems you left me out
> >> by implication, or rather the lack thereof. 
> >> 
> >> So let me guess! PJR, MMP and Mr. Senetto. 
> >> 
> >> What did I win? 
> > 
> > I remember replying to this, but here on newsgrouper my reply is
> > missing in this thread. So I'll put it back in "to set the record
> > straight" and all that: 
> > 
> > I've already mentioned their names in this thread:
> > "... his 3 stooges (Jim, Corey and Robert)...."
> > But I'll admit that I don't talk about them much. Maybe I
> > should mention them more.
> > 
> > Those were the three contributors to /April/ magazine (the original
> > magazine for aapc members) who supported MMP's
> > claim that I'd "stolen" their poems because I had a copy of /April/
> > archived on the blog.
> > 
> > All of them demanded I remove those pages of /April/ from the
> > blog. Two of them joined MMP in falsely accusing me of "literary
> > theft" (even after I'd taken their poems out of publication) on the
> > group. At least one of them also joined MMP in writing to Google
> > telling them I'd published their poems without their permission (which
> > of course could have got my whole blog removed).
> > 
> > I called them "the three stooges" because (1) there were three of
> > them and (2) they were being MMP's stooges; they were believing
> > his bull and doing what he told them to do.
> 
> For some reason I wasn't around for this. 
> 
> (Maybe I was but didn't read it. Same difference?) 
> 

If you were posting on aapc, you probably had more pressing things to look after. 
(It probably wasn't a big deal to anyone not personally involved.) 

MMP and NG sometimes post about it, but if you heard their version you probably
wouldn't realize they were talking about the same incident.