Re: Email from some moron's husband
[email protected] (Miguel Sucio)
| Newsgroups | alt.arts.poetry.comments |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Will Dockery wrote: > Miguel Sucio wrote: > >> >> Snip restored to expose you as the lying, misrepresenting P*ick you are. Snipping, then replying to a blank post, proves you can’t back up your asinine claims with facts; all you do is invent straw men to fake a victory. Where in my post did I claim to be a poet? >> Even if I had, posting examples here doesn’t make someone a poet; anyone can claim the title. You, however, can’t credibly call yourself a musician when you can’t play a single instrument. Either you’re deluded or you’re lying. I’ll take the latter. On second thought, I believe it is both. >> > > > I deleted the irrelevant content, or as we used to call it: > > "Snipped for focus." > > I restored the post you snipped. Deleting the message you reply to does not sharpen anyone’s focus. It exposes your cowardice and dishonesty. Snipping a whole post and answering the void is a cheap, transparent trick so you can lie about what you are actually responding to. Most people here can follow a thread just fine. They also see through your tired redundant game of cutting out anything you cannot answer, then play the victim and invent straw men to claim a win. It is not clever. It is pathetic. You are a gutless misleader, hiding behind edits and omissions, a fraud who confuses bluster for argument. Keep snipping. It only proves how small and hollow your act really is. This response appears in the discussion at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 -- Via JLA Forums web gateway for alt.arts.poetry.comments: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655