Re: Was. W.W. Scoggins the only witness at 10th and Patton who actually

On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 12:33:26 PM UTC-8, Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon) wrote:
> On Friday, February 26, 2021 at 8:29:37 PM UTC-5, donald willis wrote: 
> > On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 10:43:50 AM UTC-8, Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon) wrote: 
> > > On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 5:54:13 AM UTC-5, d   CUT
> > > We've covered that ad infinitum. Hill admitted he made a reasonable 
> > > conjecture based on the mere presence of shells at the scene.. 
> > We don't have much of anything from him about the shells until his 
> > testimony, where, you'll recall, he denied sending the "auto" 
> > transmission!

> I see he denied handling the shells that early. 
> == QUOTE == 
> Mr. BELIN. Had anyone at anytime given you any cartridge cases of any kind? 
> Mr. HILL. No; they had not. This came much later. 
> == UNQUOTE == 
> 
> I don't see where he denied sending the automatic transmission. Can you 
> cite that -- with links to the evidence, please -- that establishes you're 
> not misinterpreting something again?

Of course this quote from the McAdams site presupposes that you know that 
the 1:40 transmission was the one re "auto" shells, but here it is:

Mr. BELIN. Now, also turning to Sawyer Deposition Exhibit A, I notice that 
there is another call on car No. 550-2. Was that you at that time, or not, 
at 1:40 p.m.? Would that have been someone else?
Mr. HILL. That probably is R. D. Stringer.
Mr. BELIN. That is not you, then, even though it has a number 550-2?
Mr. HILL. Yes; because Stringer quite probably would have been using the 
same call number, because it is more his than it was mine, really, but I 
didn't

57

have an assigned call number, so I was using a number I didn't think 
anybody would be using, which is call 550-2, instead of the Westbrook to 
Batchelor as it indicates here.

dcw