Re: Marjorie Taylor Greene "likes" the Mossad-did-it Theory
Bud <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote: > On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 9:09:38 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 11:41:52 PM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 4:13:52 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 7:04:04 AM UTC-6, John Corbett wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 10:03:08 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 7:24:39 PM UTC-6, John McAdams wrote: > > > > > > > On 23 Feb 2021 18:03:47 -0000, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 8:51:16 PM UTC-6, John Corbett wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Nobody is defending wrongdoing. People are pointing out the hypocrisy of > > > > > > > >> the left that describes left wing riots as mostly peaceful while > > > > > > > >> describing right wing riots as insurrections. There's nothing false about > > > > > > > >> that equivalency. Both have resulted in property damage and loss of life, > > > > > > > >> but the left is only outraged at the atrocities committed by one side. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >There have been riots and unrest in this country based on outrage over > > > > > > > >racial injustice > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rioting is not a reasonable response to "racial injustice," even when > > > > > > > there is real racial injustice -- which is way less often than the > > > > > > > politically correct claim. > > > > > > > .John > > > > > > > ----------------------- http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't say it was reasonable nor justified. I simply made the point that > > > > > > that kind of unrest was historically far more common than the storming of > > > > > > our capitol building. Well, the "capitol incident" (as it's called in the > > > > > > conservative media) was actually a first. Starting fires in dumpsters, > > > > > > breaking windows and taking looting - as bad as it is - is not even close > > > > > > to being the same thing as storming the capitol with demands to get to > > > > > > certain legislatures and stop a constitutional process for the sake of a > > > > > > single individual who was letting go of power like a cat with its claws in > > > > > > the carpet - and all based on what is rightfully being called "The Big > > > > > > Lie." > > > > > > > > > > > Far more harm was done to this country by the riots of last summer than > > > > > anything that was done on January 6. It is laughable for you to try to > > > > > make the case that what happened in DC was far worse than last summer's > > > > > uprising. There is no false equivalency. There is only double standards. > > > > > > > > You say that because the attack on the capitol failed. They did NOT stop > > > > the constitutional process - only disrupted it. They did NOT get to the > > > > legislators they were seeking to ... what? Hang them? Beat them? Kidnap > > > > them? Torture them? But it wasn't for the want of trying. This was an > > > > attack on our government, not Champ Sports, Best Buy or Dunkin' Donuts. > > > As I said earlier, I don't hold Congress people in any higher regard than > > > people who own businesses like Champ Sports, Best Buy, or Dunkin Donuts. I > > > don't regard an attack on any of these to be more egregious that any > > > others. On the other hand, since you do think an attack on Congress is > > > more egregious than those on private businesses, was it any more egregious > > > then the mob that threatened to breech the fence around the White House > > > last summer. That one forced the Secret Service to take Trump to the White > > > House shelter. That was Antifa and BLM at work. Are you going to claim > > > that is a false equivalency too? Because if you do, you are an even bigger > > > hypocrite than I thought. > > > > > > > > These dumbshits storm into the capitol, can't find whom their looking for > > > > and ran out of ideas of what to do next. They broke windows, stole > > > > podiums, name plates off doors, took selfies and took photographs of > > > > documents that they didn't even understand. It reminds me of that scene in > > > > the Will Ferrell movie "Old School", where Will Ferrell gets drunk and > > > > wants to go group streaking. He leads the charge but then figures out that > > > > nobody is following and runs out of ideas of what to do next. > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgL95-90quM&t=0m31s > > > Compared to the destruction wreaked during left wing protests last summer, > > > the property damage was minimal. I'll bet if you tallied it all up, it > > > wouldn't amount to 1% of the damage that was done in rioting last summer. > > > > > > > > The disparity in the POTENTIAL for harm cannot be compared. It's fortunate > > > > that all our legislators were ushered out of there to safety. Imagine how > > > > that would've played out had they stormed in more quickly while all were > > > > present and in session. Like I said, we've had racially-motivated riots > > > > before. The the capitol thing was something completely new and far more > > > > dangerous to our democracy. It was, quite literally, an attack on > > > > democracy. I think that's far worse. You obviously disagree. > > > > > > > You are being melodramatic. You are way overstating the danger that mob > > > posed. Those in Congress were in no more danger than Trump was last > > > summer. Both were ushered to safety as a precaution. The Capitol police > > > had far more firepower than the rioters. Had they forced the issue, there > > > would have been a lot more than just the one rioter shot dead. > > > > > > It really comes down to one thing. You are willing to excuse left wing > > > rioters but not right wing rioters because you sympathize with the former. > > The double standard is really stark in this case.... > > > > https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2021/02/25/nyc-molotov-cocktail-lawyers-offered-plea-deal/ > > > > These two were filmed trying to pass out molotov cocktails to the crowd. > > They were filmed throwing a molotov cocktail into a police vehicle. They > > were filmed espousing violence. > > > > The FBI has a slam dunk case but is offering a plea deal (this is the > > only time I can remember them not saying what the plea deal is). Why? > > Because they are leftists all the most serious charges that the feds could > > clearly easily win in court will be dropped. They will probably be allowed > > to continue to practice law. > > > > She was born in Pakistan, he was born in Jamaica but they come here and > > throw bombs. > If the bar association has any guts, they will disbar these two. They would be automatically disbarred if convicted of a felony, which is why you can be sure the plea deal will not include any, even though it would be an easy conviction. But think about it, they were filmed distributing molotov cocktails to an angry mob. Presumably the idea is that they would be thrown at police by that angry mob. Now these two were let right out on bail, but watch Rachel Maddow mock the guy who had his feet up on Pelosi`s desk for complaining about unfairness... https://www.aol.com/news/not-fair-man-put-feet-220523247.html So for distributing bombs to burn cops alive you get right out, but if you put your feet up on a desk, you are held without bail. There are two sets of laws in this country these days, one for people on the left and one for people on the right. People are being hunted down for participation in the incident at the Capitol.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-2ZmG2hPMk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOxlZdL4rmQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00wZyDcp7SE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlcOPIumIuE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceH9sMvbqVE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H2BW7CavZM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td4KOAeXchE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRsf-MYO8DA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuqHGW1VFxA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDKVyDQcft0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1mc69vtgkU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejmnRXZeWkw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V84R_jqd1aE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F67VbRYYbEQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnyL4Xg9sLA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IWt6w2CB4Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EyKQfiBMnU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbcnKr9Tb_0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqSQ50D2Udw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOcNa_NmtQ4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbaEAAm9Ogw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8XMGMceEeU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D6Hfw72Oj4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp9oNr6HCxw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9_hGYHFLYE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl9wlcdQIas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IP6ezC5C2kU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEye_N0POTU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmEPHoh9hs4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suVYrcVC8YE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=em_aIfi8NYc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-YW32Nzomw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaW0G2pOH9s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emSMCog_asg Many, many more. Notice how efficient the FBI is when it involves this particular political incident, but totally inept it is against leftist violence. Either that or is is part of a politically motivated vendetta against anyone seen as a Trump supporter. When the full weight of the US Government is only used against *certain* people with *certain* viewpoints this country is in big trouble. Meanwhile case after case involving Antifa are being dismissed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMPJAohVCzk