Re: Marie Tippit Passed
"Steve M. Galbraith" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 12:44:49 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote: > On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 9:09:41 PM UTC-5, John McAdams wrote: > > https://www.newser.com/story/303261/one-of-our-last-direct-links-to-jfk-assassination-is-gone.html > > > > Mostly I find conspiracy hobbyists to be a harmless lot but the one thing > that gets my chili hot is when some accuse Tippit of being part of the > conspiracy based on nothing more than runaway speculation. They think > nothing of besmirching a police officer slain in the line of duty because > to them it's all a game. Tippit, Ruth Paine, Norman, Jarman...it's not a small list. The hobbyists - not all but the ones who do this - don't seem to care a bit about what they accuse these people of. It's one thing to say LBJ or Hoover or a noted figure was involved. For good or bad these figures have to suffer the "slings and arrows" of life. But who defends these people? Here we have ordinary Americans caught up in something that overwhelmed them. They were confused and disoriented and afraid and puzzled. So their accounts mirror that; contradictory and disjointed. But no, all of this was part of the script. I've often cited that statement by Oliver Stone in his defense of Garrison: "Sometimes in a war you have to sacrifice some people." That is what I think these conspiracists do (again not all). They are so certain of their cause that they don't care whether these people get hurt. For them, well you just have to sacrifice them for the larger battle.