Re: Capitol Mob - "Pretty Normal People"

Bud <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.assassination.jfk
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 3:56:46 PM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:
> On Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 12:55:13 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote: 
> > On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 9:06:54 PM UTC-5, ajohnstone wrote: 
> > > >I suppose I have an advantage over you ... He wasn`t killed at the riot. 
> > > >He texted his brother that the only thing that happened to him was that 
> > > >he was hit by some bear spray. He went back to the precinct and had a 
> > > >heart attack. 
> > > Sorry to rain on your parade but i had already linked to this incident in 
> > > an earlier post 
> > I brought it up three weeks ago over in the nuthouse in a post to Don 
> > Willis. He actually believes what the mainstream media tells him. 
> > 
> > https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/wudxrx_FIjo/m/8UyZ1ybLBQAJ 
> > > https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-false-and-exaggerated-claims 
> > > 
> > > The author went into some detail about the Sicknick death and explained 
> > > the motive behind the deliberate misrepresentation. 
> > > 
> > > "...Without Sicknick having his skull bashed in with a fire extinguisher, 
> > > there were no deaths that day that could be attributed to deliberate 
> > > violence by pro-Trump protesters..." 
> > > 
> > > You are not the only one who accesses information from sources other than 
> > > the mainstream media. 
> > You quoted me out of context. What I said was... 
> > "I suppose I have an advantage over you because I never believed anything 
> > the Democrats or the mainstream media had to say about the event." 
> > I don`t believe anything they say unless I can corroborate it myself 
> > using sources I trust. They don`t have zero credibility, they are in the 
> > red. The idea that five people died as a result of the Capitol incident 
> > was never the default that needed to be disproven with me. 
> > 
> > Do you think that if a cop went back to his precinct after battling BLM 
> > rioters and died of a stroke you would have heard about it? Other than Fox 
> > news the MSM is all spin, lies and propaganda for the Democratic Party. 
> > And liberals seem to think that holding Fox as an exception is 
> > hypocritical, but not when they expose lies like this cop being killed by 
> > violent Trump supporters. When they tell the truth and expose lies that 
> > gains them credibility in my eyes, leftists seem to prefer the lies they 
> > are told, they tenaciously hold onto these false narratives.
> It's a sad commentary on the mainstream media that we can't take their 
> word for ANYTHING. How can I trust people to accurately report the news 
> when they have such an obvious bias and agenda. Even if they are telling 
> me the truth, they are only telling half of it, the half they won't me to 
> know. 
> 
> It is an absolute disgrace that they ran with the story for weeks that a 
> Capitol cop had been murdered during the riot and when they finally did 
> fess up, they did so without a hint of remorse. Most of the people who 
> control the information that the public is receiving are complete scumbags 
> who don't deserve an ounce of respect and most people don't give them any. 
> I have more respect for drug dealers, pimps, and whores than I do for the 
> most of the people that report the news. At least they are giving people 
> what they pay for.

  This new liberalism seems totally unprincipled to me, it seems very "the 
end justifies the means", if they can fib or spin information it is ok if 
it helps save the planet (in their eyes) or helps fight racism (in their 
eyes). Since all the people at the Capitol event are convicted racists in 
the eyes of the left anything done to them is fine.

 I generally avoid the MSM, but when I sign out of my email on AOL there 
are usually some headlines and I might click on one if the headline baits 
me.

  Today it was this one...

  "Fighting Biden virus aid, GOP rekindles Obama-era strategy."

  I clicked to find out what "strategy" was being "rekindled" and found 
out the strategy was telling the truth. The first paragraph has this...

 "Republicans have one goal for President Joe Biden’s $1.9 
trillion COVID-19 relief package: to erode public support for the rescue 
plan by portraying it as too big, too bloated and too much wasteful public 
spending for a pandemic that’s almost over."

  Calling it what it is is portrayed as some ploy to fool the public.

  https://www.aol.com/news/fighting-biden-virus-aid-gop-052006685-125614295.html

  A huge chunk of money is going to bail out blue states so they can 
continue to do the things that put them in the red in the first place.

  Another headline was about the impending Chauvin trial. There will be 
nationwide riots because, why not? Looting and destruction has been 
decriminalized. The only thing that will stop this from occurring time and 
time again is a zero tolerance policy like that shown with the Capitol 
protests.

  https://www.aol.com/news/minneapolis-prepares-potential-unrest-ahead-110046142.html

 You see a lot of talk about emotion in these articles, unfortunately it 
carries no weight in a courtroom (or shouldn`t, anyway). These people are 
bound to be disappointed.

  Democrats are always there to throw fuel on the fire...

 “We know that this trial is going to reignite the same kind of 
emotional and social response that we saw last summer,” the 
councilman said.

  Hilarious that they are afraid that white supremacists are going to show 
up and start trouble. That is the least of their worries.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.