Re: A Better Way to Think About Conspiracy Theories
ajohnstone <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just for further background reading, this interview PART 1 https://www.salon.com/2021/02/20/conspiracy-theories--unmasked-from-winston-churchill-to-qanon-in-a-few-easy-steps/ PART 2 https://www.salon.com/2021/03/06/the-dark-truth-about-conspiracy-theories-theyre-everywhere-can-they-be-stopped/ Just on a purely personal note, i became a skeptic when as a schoolboy i fell hook, line and sinker for Von Daniken's 'Chariot of the Gods', to later discover his blatant distortions of facts and events and concluded that they were not blunders but purposeful deceit. Selective reading of only 'friendly' and 'trusted' sources reinforces a closed mind. As witnessed, my politics are far apart from those here (even your resident 'dissident', Anthony Marsh, is a right-winger compared to me) yet we can find common cause in understanding one particular incident, the murder of JFK by LHO. It is one of basic analysis on how to accept and how to reject particular evidence. Do i deny conspiracies exist? No, not at all. But they are hard to distinguish from the 'normal' practice of media manipulation and political spin.